In its submission to the Australian government’s review of the regulatory framework around AI, Google said that copyright law should be altered to allow for generative AI systems to scrape the internet.

  • Roundcat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just take comfort in the fact that my art will never be good enough for a generative Ai to steal.

    • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      If it’s on any major platform, these companies will probably still use it since I doubt at that point if they were allowed to scrape the whole internet they’d have any human looking over the art used.

      It’ll just be thrown in with everything else similar to how I always seem to find paper towels in the dryer after doing laundry.

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Bad” art is still useful in training these models because it can be illustrative of what not to do. When prompting image generators it’s common to include “negative prompts” along with your regular one, telling the AI what sorts of things it should avoid putting in the output image. If I stuck “by Roundcat” into the negative prompts it would try to do things other than the things you did.