• Reborn2966@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      if people do cross posts, will i see the post only once?

      will lemmy detect that i can see the original + 3 crossposts and show me only the original?

      this is more like a feature request, i don’t think we are there yet.

      we could also aggregate and sync comments across cross postings, so that the post is really just one, but posted in more than one community.

      • Blaze (he/him)@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        if people do cross posts, will i see the post only once?

        will lemmy detect that i can see the original + 3 crossposts and show me only the original?

        On the website, it does

        • Amilo159@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Problem is on mobile apps. If it works on website, that’s good but doesn’t solve the problem of majority of users that are on mobile.

              • Jeena@jemmy.jeena.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                19
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Interestingly the title is “my biggest gripe with Lemmy” not “my biggest gripe with my app of choice”.

                • jiji@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  OP, like me, probably doesn’t/didn’t know that the website interface for Lemmy has a solution for this and it’s actually an app problem. So to OP it is a “Lemmy” gripe until we’re given more info. :)

                • Tywèle [she|her]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  The comment you were replying to was talking about mobile apps and not the mobile website.

                  Edit: took some rudeness out of the comment

    • Deiv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This was a game changer for me when I saw someone suggest it

    • Lux@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      all of the posts in the screenshot were less than 6 hours old, so that probably wouldn’t help

      • three20three@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It would give you the top posts from the last 6 hours so they should go away.

        Hot or Active give you a lot of stuff that would fall under “New”.

        Edit: I just looked at the top 20 posts on my Top (6H) feed and they all have 200 points or more. All of the posts on your screen shot have less than 20.

  • nieceandtows@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Eh. Eventually one of them would win out. I posted the same link in movies@lemmy.world and moviesandtv@lemmy.film. The first one hasn’t had any comments where as the second one has more than a dozen comments. I know where I’ll post the next time.

    • hatter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      A lot of people seem to have forgotten (or maybe just weren’t around at the time) but there were tons of duplicate communities on reddit during the first years too. Over time their mods either agreed to close one and point everyone to the other or the less active ones faded away naturally.

      One problematic scenario I can envision with that approach on Lemmy however is the mods of news@lemmysite1 and news@lemmysite2 agreeing to keep the first one alive, but then after a while lemmysite1 closes for whatever reason. So we’re left with news@lemmysite2 which is a ghost town. Probably not a big deal for a news community, but for something with a lot of info on a particular topic it’s not really ideal.

        • Slowy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The old one was revived, the admins of lemmy world don’t agree with parking community names

  • Chickenstalker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do you wake up on the same snowy day, every day, with Sonny and Cher’s “I got you babe” playing on the clock radio?

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Nah, but I can’t seem to get out of this retro hotel room. It’s freezing in here, and “We’ve Only Just Begun” by The Carpenters keeps playing from the clock radio even though I unplugged it.

      spoiler

      1408

  • Chozo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    I suggested an idea to fix this, that I called “thread entanglement”. I had suggested it for Kbin specifically, before, but honestly the base Lemmy software could use something like this. I’d love to see some sort of smart merging of duplicate threads like this be possible.

    • 🇵🇸 Free Palestine 🇵🇸
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      As others have mentioned in that thread. It would be better as an option from the user side rather than site wide forced implementation. I hope you open a GitHub issue/discussion in the repository so the idea could get more exposure.

  • Psaldorn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If the title text is the same it should just squash them, show you all the options on further inspection.

    • wjrii@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is my preferred option. Requires no underlying change to ActivityPub or federation, just makes the end user experience more pleasant until/unless communities gain more distinct personalities that would result in fewer reposts.

    • realitista@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Better yet, it should semi-force you to post as a crosspost which would remove the duplicate from end user feeds. Especially if there’s already a post on another community with a matching content link.

      • humanplayer2
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sync also seems to be pretty good at not showing so many duplicates from different communities, but maybe that’s placebo.

        • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I also find that. Connect would rerun the same posts quite quickly. Sync also seems to not show me so many non-English instances, although perhaps I’ve blocked them all?

          • humanplayer2
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No idea about language. I cans still see the non-English instance I’m on, but I check that deliberately as there’s not a lot of traffic.

  • Voyajer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    There are a couple of users I recognize just because of the amount of duplicate/triplicate/quadruplicate posts I see from them, often times grouped up like that too.

    • pizzaboi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which… Why? There’s no karma to farm here, just post it once and let the conversation happen there.

      No offense to anyone, but I’m down voting duplicates to try to stop this shit.

      • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because there’s more then one community of the same topic. They’re actually doing a really good thing, they’re trying to grow multiple communities. It’s not karma farming here, it’s supporting communities. That is much preferably then people only submitting to the biggest community and create more centralization.

        • luciferofastora@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          The whole point of making a federated network of independent instances is to avoid the issues arising with one central instance, right? Putting the content out to multiple instances plays into that: If it’s important content, no single authority can easily censor it, and the loss of a single instance won’t erase it.

          If it’s trash, of course, every community in every instance you post it to will have to clean it up separately. Arguably, that puts more strain on the respective moderation teams, but if (ideally) those are disjunct people (again, to avoid the issues of a single authority), the strain should be distributed.

          And on the plus side, it would enable each community (in the lemmy sense) to enforce their own nuanced rules, additionally leading to slightly more choice between the types of moderation you favour (as opposed to “There’s one big sub, take it or leave it”).

          Individual communities may be smaller, but maybe some more form of coordination of similar communities across instances could amend that (like linking to the other communities in your sidebar etc.).

          I could also imagine a super-community solution that would allow you to aggregate several communities across instances similar to multireddits. I’m new here, so I’m not sure if that exists, nor have I given the implementation any thought, but I suppose that could be convenient.

        • pizzaboi@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hadn’t thought about it like that. Thanks. I think this will become less of an annoyance over time, too. The more communities show up and get active, the more I subscribe to, then the more I’ll use my subscribe feed and therefore won’t see the duplicates.

  • 7Sea_Sailor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Keep in mind you can always block communities you’re not interested in to prevent them from appearing in any feed. I’ve already blocked plenty of communities to make the “All” post list digestable.

    • amio@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There are so many though. I’m trying to prune politics from my feed but people keep making new goddamn communities - a dozen isn’t enough, apparently - and then crossposting everything everywhere anyway.

    • Delphia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can also block users, which is super helpful with people that go on crossposting rampages.

      • 7Sea_Sailor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why would I? The list of communities which one wants to block is very personal / individual. My preferences what I don’t want to engage with is purely mine and cannot be transferred to all other users. So any user should make their own decisions what communities they want to block, instead of blindly copying someone elses and potentially missing out on content they would enjoy.

        • Blaze (he/him)@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree with you to an extent, but I think there should still be a default list of blocked instances that we could provide to new joiners, so that they can at least have a base to avoid the experience OP had.

          Of course that would be opt-in, but at least that would ease the adoption a bit.

    • フ卂ㄖ卄乇卂卄@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      lemmy.world got too big IMO. So I ended up switching to a different instance. If all the users were to evenly distribute themselves across many instances, and not just have everyone on like 1-3 different instances, I think that the issues with unavailability, lag, and whatnot would happen much less.

    • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I had the most issues on my lemmy.world account. I’ve had less issues on my lemmy.ca account, maybe try making an account on a different instance? World has been getting attacked a lot lately.

    • Cr4yfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m actually trying to solve this issue on my own Lemmy app. It automatically switches instances when the requested one is down. Works only in the Feed right now and, of course, accounts are still instance-bound - but I will fix that soon.

    • sicjoke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      considering hopping onto a different instance because of this. Lemmy.world in particular always seems to be experiencing issues.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I personally wouldn’t use one the larger instances, as they’re usually going to have the most issues (more complex deployments, longer maintenance downtimes, etc)

      • BrisaLuna@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I am most comfortable with lemmy.world because of their old reddit formatting. It made the transition easy. Call it lazy or low brain, but maybe if other instances will also do the old format, they might get more users shifting to their instances too?

        Still trying to learn here, but so far I find myself jumping back to old.lemmy.world simple because of familiarity.

  • Deebster
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m surprised that no-one’s brought out a client that can merge communities. People properly using the cross-posting feature seems to help with this a bit.

    • Jeena@jemmy.jeena.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      At least if lemmy detects the same link it should view it as a cross-post automatically, even if people didn’t use the cross-post UI.

    • CynicRaven@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fuck yeah! I was just thinking about this the other day. Like a singular mask for all political communities, one for pictures, etc. Almost how Gaim/Pidgin/Adium/Trillion did for the multitude of competing chat programs back in the day.

        • Jeena@jemmy.jeena.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          But my favourite implementation would be that I as a user should be able to create virtual communities where I can put in one, two or several communities into one and it would be shown like one community in my UI.

      • wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I haven’t thought of those clients in years. I feel old. Used all of them except Adium, and I think it was just a specific kind of Trillian? Not too sure, it’s kind of fuzzy.

        This sentence is being uttered by me more and more the last couple weeks.

        Guess I’ll be dead of old age by next month or so. Rip.

        • CynicRaven@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          lol you better not be dead in the next month or so!

          I think Adium was, or now that I’m looking at Wikipedia became the OSX(as it was named at the time) implementation of Gaim/Pidgin. Was its own thing but started getting Gaim/Pidgin stuff implemented in it. Trillian, I think, was distinct because it was a closed source commercial product whereas the Gaim/Pidgin/Adium has always been an open source free kind of deal.

  • pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I appreciate the poster sharing the article to multiple communities/instances, but would be nice if the Lemmy front-end could batch these (maybe with a link like “appears in a@b, b@b, c@a …”) if the user + link + title all hashed out to the same thing.

  • havokdj@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    My biggest gripe is that 3/4th of what I write on here ends in an angry argument, usually somehow about politics (in an area of politics I don’t even GAF about!)

    Seriously considering just hopping to another instance.