• Kata1yst@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The point of the permanent members of security council was to bring superpowers to the table and keep them there. Otherwise they could play their games and the smaller countries would all suffer for it.

    Of course there are still problems, but through the security council and MAD we now have proxy wars and culture wars rather than a World War every couple decades.

    • WolfhoundRO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      In the perspective of actually preventing a new World War by drawing lines between superpowers instead of appeasement, I believe that the UN actually fulfills its role the best they can. Unlike its predecessor, the League of Nations, which went so much into the “appeasement against war” from its founding members (Britain and France) that it functionally collapsed in thw wake of WW2