• Hayduke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    You mean he polled a number out of his ass. He doesn’t need to go through the effort of asking anyone to get an actionable result. The results from bots and racists would have been similar anyway.

  • WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    178
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    It doesn’t get much more Musk than, "I polled the racists and they said racism is okay, so racism is okay "

    • 100@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      66
      ·
      9 hours ago

      polled? more like he entered some numbers for the vote counts in backend

        • Lemminary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 hours ago

          See, I’d agree but this is Musk we’re talking about. I wouldn’t be surprised if this douche sent some poor, naive and overeager but overworked intern on a groundbreaking task to gain his admiration and trust by fudging some numbers with fake accounts. So while you think nobody needs to do that, that’s it’s terribly inefficient and only a psychopath drunk on power would pull such a thing, what you need to keep in mind is that this billionaire needs his ego stroked on every turn by some fresh young impressionable men, as he does.

          I don’t know Musk personally but I believe this because there was once some poor, ground-feeding soul who went through this entire process to please his master and Tweeted about his weeks-long process adding some insignificant feature to the site as if it were groundbreaking work back when the site was still named Twitter and none of the replaced employees knew how any of that shit worked. The dude was nothing but raving and hyping himself up and down the feed kissing ass. I also believe this because one of his former team members blew the whistle on his Substack(?) on the unethical and probably illegal shit they were doing with bot accounts during the elections.

          (I can try to find the blog post if you want to read it but trust me bro on the other guy.)

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 hours ago

    You mean bots, right? Polling bots. Also this doesn’t account for all the people that have blocked you or don’t even use twitter anymore. It’s like if my friends all told me they didn’t like Chinese food and my conclusion is that nobody likes Chinese food.

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 hours ago

    “If you are not part of my website your vote does not count ha ha ha”

  • snekerpimp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    9 hours ago

    So he polled a bunch of bots and racist mother fuckers to see what to do with the racist mother fucker?

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Not event that. Why would he do that the hard way?

      He just published a result that shows people agree and that’s it

  • TheFogan@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Geeze… so step 1. turn twitter into a racist cespit that only racists can stomac it. Step 2… use it as the platform for direct democracy…

    • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Well to be fair, and I do not personally believe this is the right thing, no one said democracy needed to be inclusive. In fact for most of history democracy has been the opposite. So it checks out.

      • Ech@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 hours ago

        no one said democracy needed to be inclusive

        I say that.

      • OrteilGenou@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Is there a form of government that is inclusive? Seems to me that the practice of working to ensure that underserved demographics are represented runs counter to the thinking of the average power hungry dickhead who gravitates toward politics

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The whole point is for it to be inclusive. Yes it has never fully lived up to that potential but the people fighting and clawing for the last few hundred years have brought it closer and closer with time.

  • BassTurd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I hope the masses let that little racist fucker know how they feel about him ad nauseum. Harass the Nazis.

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I polled myself. I say Musk is a Nazi who should be tossed in front of the nearest self-driving Tesla.

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    9 hours ago

    This is the guy who has full unfettered admin access to Treasury Department, in case you were wondering.

    • metaStatic@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Good chance he was pushed by someone with actual power because of his views on Israel and this is all about Musk showing all the racism the media is running with instead was fine.

    • AmidFuror@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I remarked on that at the time.

      Edit: Mbin does something new with fediverse links that totally butchers how this is embedded in the text I intended. Not sure if it just looks like a sentence with some hyperlinked text to Lemmy users.