Most people do not read the article link that’s posted. So I put an AI summary of the link as a comment, but as a spoiler so if you don’t want to engage with it you don’t have to and also the full article so people can more accessibly read the article. Also as a spoiler so it doesn’t take up a full page of a comment. It got removed by a mod as AI slop.

I could use AI on a headline and you would never know the difference. I could just say it’s my own summary also probably wouldn’t know the difference. Punishing people for being transparent about using LLMs who are not forcing the reader to engage with them is a net positive and a good practice to teach. The opposite is people still use them and just pretend they aren’t.

    • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      By “here,” I mean this entire post that only you the OP think is a good idea. Or is there any comment that I missed?

      People who think using AI for article summaries is good:
      You

      People who think using AI for article summaries is trash:
      WhyEssEff
      sgtlion (sgtlion only said AI is good for coding and debugging and said that AI is 90% slop)
      DoiDoi
      MiraculousMM
      RotundLadSloopUnion
      Leon_Grotsky
      imogen_underscore
      Infamousblt
      blunder
      Me

      People who are asking clarifying questions:
      glans

      People who are shitposting:
      Lemmygradwontallowme

      Do you dispute with how I’m characterizing their opinion on using AI for article summaries?