Most people do not read the article link that’s posted. So I put an AI summary of the link as a comment, but as a spoiler so if you don’t want to engage with it you don’t have to and also the full article so people can more accessibly read the article. Also as a spoiler so it doesn’t take up a full page of a comment. It got removed by a mod as AI slop.

I could use AI on a headline and you would never know the difference. I could just say it’s my own summary also probably wouldn’t know the difference. Punishing people for being transparent about using LLMs who are not forcing the reader to engage with them is a net positive and a good practice to teach. The opposite is people still use them and just pretend they aren’t.

  • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    By “here,” I mean this entire post that only you the OP think is a good idea. Or is there any comment that I missed?

    People who think using AI for article summaries is good:
    You

    People who think using AI for article summaries is trash:
    WhyEssEff
    sgtlion (sgtlion only said AI is good for coding and debugging and said that AI is 90% slop)
    DoiDoi
    MiraculousMM
    RotundLadSloopUnion
    Leon_Grotsky
    imogen_underscore
    Infamousblt
    blunder
    Me

    People who are asking clarifying questions:
    glans

    People who are shitposting:
    Lemmygradwontallowme

    Do you dispute with how I’m characterizing their opinion on using AI for article summaries?