military members should be bullied. when one walks into your place of business and asks for a military discount say count dis dick

    • Lemister [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The twitter take is that we do not need ex-soldiers and that drug dealers deserve more “grace”. And I brought up the example of chinese socialists as an example to draw lessons from. People took issue because somehow the Brits flooding chinese markets with addictive substances to further their imperial ambitions is somehow alien to Americans flooding their own internal markets to secure their imperial ambitions.

      • 7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        People took issue because somehow the Brits flooding chinese markets with addictive substances to further their imperial ambitions is somehow alien to Americans flooding their own internal markets to secure their imperial ambitions.

        I mean…yeah? yeah it is?

          • 7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            These two points do not contradict each other at all. Imperalism turned inwards is just very different from imperalism turned outwards.

            • bbnh69420 [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              How so? What’s the difference between the US importing crack and heroin to mollify revolutionary elements within society and Britain exporting opium to make the Chinese more vulnerable to exploitation?

              • 7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                At the time that was happening the US claimed to be a democracy for one, to stick to that example. It doesn’t make that better by any means, but the results of whether your own (democratic) country has that happening vs. it being inflicted by a foreign power makes a big difference in perception, which then guides action

                • bbnh69420 [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Why does the “democratic” nature of the US matter more, the internal colonized people in the US didn’t see drugs as less of a threat because it was “their” government instead of a foreign one?

                  • 7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    19 hours ago

                    I’d argue the reception, even post that coming out, is very much different between “this was foisted upon us by a hostile nation” vs. “this was a small part of the state that kind of did an oopsie for a while but we fixed it now” and that’s without even getting into american exceptionalism basically overwriting the last part with “no that didn’t happen” for large swathes of people