Before the election - Bluesky libs amused me by saying the name of the project was ominous. One, it doesn’t sound “ominous” at all. It sounds bland not malignant. Two, who gives a fuck what it’s called! I ended up muting Project2025 for a few months because the libs kept saying the same things over and over.
longstanding aims
It makes me kind of insane how the dems hyper-fixate on Trump and entirely forget history, recent events, and context. Before the 2000 election - if Dubya had had a project 2001 - the right wingers could have gotten everything they wanted after 9/11 because the dems would have wanted to show strength and unity. There surely would have been a bipartisan push to “streamline” the federal government by crippling it by cutting Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, etc.
I hate that Project 2025 has become some sort of buzzword for what is really the longstanding aims of the conservative political project.
Before the election - Bluesky libs amused me by saying the name of the project was ominous. One, it doesn’t sound “ominous” at all. It sounds bland not malignant. Two, who gives a fuck what it’s called! I ended up muting
Project 2025for a few months because the libs kept saying the same things over and over.It makes me kind of insane how the dems hyper-fixate on Trump and entirely forget history, recent events, and context. Before the 2000 election - if Dubya had had a project 2001 - the right wingers could have gotten everything they wanted after 9/11 because the dems would have wanted to show strength and unity. There surely would have been a bipartisan push to “streamline” the federal government by crippling it by cutting Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, etc.
It was called the Project for the New American Century, Rove and Rumsfeld’s very own project 2000