Every time Windows updates itself, my Linux disappears. Actually, it’s just hidden, only the boot menu was overwritten. You need a computer maintenance technician to make a new boot menu. I use a USB stick with a live Linux with automatic boot repair tools.

Recently, Windows has become resistant to Boot Repair Disk. Now I have to open computer firmware by tapping “Esc” right after power-up, then select “Boot options”, then “Linux”.


EU must ban all US-made smart products for its own safety. All closed-source software and electronics that can be used for strategic manipulation and sabotage – Google, Apple, Amazon, all of it.

We have functional, clunky open-source software that could easily be fitted for any purpose with the money we waste propping up foreign monopolies sabotaging us. Europe has taken a huge risk. I suspect bribery.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I got do pissed one day that I figured out a good work around. Get a second drive just big enough for Linux and a third just big enough for windows. Then just remove windows and Linux from your big “must be safe” drive. Now install Linux on your Linux drive and Windows on your windows drive. Next, go to Fstab on Linux and Mount your big drive as either home for all users or a single user’s home. Similarly go to Windows and mount the Linux home drive. You’ll probably need to install drivers to even see the thing. I don’t mix my Linux home. Instead I have a small drive for windows to fuck up shit into (which is what it does). Finally use the Linux bootloader and tell Windows to stay in its fucking place or shut the fuck up. It works.

  • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The fix for this is pretty simple. Uninstall Windows and never look back. I haven’t used any Microsoft products in years now.

  • secretlyaddictedtolinux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    14 hours ago

    They are doing everyone a favor. Why woukd you want that shit on your computer at all?

    Or if you simply must use Windows, why not use KVM?

    This seems like Windows developers doing everyone a solid: “You sure you want this shit to have root access over everyrhing?” they are asking.

  • ober9000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I mean Microsofts programming is also just shit. I remember installing Windows 7 back then. The computer had an SSD and a HDD in it with old files. I later removed the HDD and it wouldn’t boot. Because even though I installed Windows on the SSD, it put the bootloader onto the HDD.

    • kadup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Windows still does that to this day. For some random reason, it will often create the EFI boot partition in a different drive than the one you’re installing Windows to.

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I’m surprised that Windows overrides the UEFI partition at every boot. They should not be allowed to do this.

    But also, i’m kinda surprised that Windows allows the wubi.exe Ubuntu installer to write to the UEFI boot menu.

    I agree that better regulations need to be put in place. I too suspect bribery. How else would you explain that we’re getting surveillance package instead of this?

  • merthyr1831
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    2 days ago

    FWIW dual booting from the same physical drive is never a good idea in my experience. Even Linux-Linux dual booting is just asking for problems when one of them updates the grub configs and messes it up for the other.

    Save yourself some sanity and move your Windows install to a new drive.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      I tried to do a dual boot from 2 hard drives (windows main), had to restore the Linux side early on, using its built in restore tool, and the computer would not boot after beyond a black screen without pulling the battery for the BIOS off the motherboard. No boot menus or firmware or bios menus were accessible until I did that.

      That’s the worst oh shit did I fully break my computer moment ever.

      • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 hours ago

        As someone who just started using Linux regularly, this seems bonkers to me.

        Unless you’re building your own kernel and compiling apps from scratch, why would anything in /bin break?

    • InFerNo
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      One if my laptops only has 1 bay for a drive unfortunately. Currently going through the motion OP describes. Updating Windows and repairing the bootloader. It’s still MBR, not uefi, too.

      • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Does it have an optical disk drive? You could replace that with an HDD caddy if you really want an extra disk

    • mildlyusedbrain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is really the advice to take. I tried dual boot and went back to Windows due to it nuking grub.

      Tried again after buying a new SSD and haven’t had an issues since

  • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Win11 bricked my linux install usb. Microsoft also colluded with intel to make intel cpus appear to perform better by sandbagging AMD cpus.

    Bill Gates may be a nice guy but his company has become trash.

    • MonkderVierte
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Bill Gates may have become a nice guy but his company is trash.

      Better, no?

      • MonkderVierte
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Sad thing is, the NT kernel itself is POSIX and compatible and all. But the UI on top doesn’t support half of it.

        Edit: it was POSIX and OS/2 compatibel, then they removed it.

        • renzev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          17 hours ago

          The funny thing is, as far as I can tell, the only reason why NT has a posix subsystem is to comply with some weird government regulation.

          From Wikipedia:

          The NT POSIX subsystem was included with the first versions of Windows NT because of 1980s US federal government requirements listed in Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) 151-2. Briefly, these documents required that certain types of government purchases be POSIX-compliant, so that if Windows NT had not included this subsystem, computing systems based on it would not have been eligible for some government contracts.

  • CubitOom@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Safest thing to do is run windows only in a VM or container with Linux as the host OS and pass the hardware required in. Windows actually runs better this way and can’t mess with your Linux install.

    • xyz1195@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      “That’s not how anything works” meme material right here.

      How can literally anything run better on a vm compared to physical?

      • CubitOom@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        To understand why windows runs better in a vm or container, you’d have to understand how the windows kernels work… And that means understanding how all the code from every previous Windows kernel that is still in windows 11 works. Since they never did a full rewrite. For example you’d have to understand why blue screens of death happen, and how windows telemetry works, what code from windows 3.1 still exist, and what windows 11 really does when it tries to serve you ads. I’m not qualified, and as far as I can tell no one at Microsoft is either.

        I know your wrote some kind of gotcha but you really should try it and see for yourself if you actually need windows for anything. At a minimum I guarantee it’s more stable.

    • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      How does it run better?

      I’ve avoided it specifically for performance reasons, this is new to me, for one program that WINE doesn’t like.

      • marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Linux manages disk access way better than Windows.

        But anything that depends on CPU, memory, or IO lattency will get slower.

      • CubitOom@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’ve not actually benchmarked it. Although others have and I couldn’t really tell you why but windows spends a lot less time and resources trying to manage itself when it’s in a VM or container. It’s just much snapier and even when passing in a GPU to play games it preforms well.

          • S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            AFAIK Virtualization is very Dependant on hardware. Some processors are not optimized for virtualization at all so even if you have great video cards or anything the virtualization could still run like shit for you and run seamlessly for someone with less specs. Don’t ask me which ones are good I learnt this the hard way while trying to use a celeron to run a VM.

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Well, to some degree I’m sure you’re right. But the thing is, I’ve used VMs off and on for at least 15 years on AMD, Intel, and ARM cpus. My universal experience has been that software running within those VMs, even on an incredibly fast host machine, runs so slow it’s painful. I have mostly used VirtualBox which I know a lot of people hate but it’s been the only one I have found that usually “just works”. So I dunno. If you have a better suggestion for a VM host that runs fast on linux (x86) I’d love to hear it because I’m currently trying to permanently ditch windows and VMs could be a part of that because I do want access to Photoshop and a few other Adobe apps. But thusfar when I’ve tried that, the slowness has been unbearable.

      • ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        If you aren’t gaming, you don’t care about performance past giving CPU/RAM enough resources to VM.

        If you are multiplayer gaming and unwilling to give it up or be very tech savvy, VM isn’t an option.

        Well maybe, see: https://looking-glass.io/

        If you single player game, you just need pcie passthrough to your VM.

        • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Those resources are the concern. Yes, a VM works fine, but works better than native windows? That’s where my question is.

          Also, I care a lot about performance if I’m running my system on a potato.

  • Lazycog@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I agree with your post but I must ask - is that King Charles taking the wheel UEFI Boot partition?

    Thanks for the confirmations. It indeed seems to be King Charles taking the UEFI Boot Partition. Microsoft Monarchy at it again taking what belongs to the people.

  • RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I use a Dualboot with Windows 10 (there are unfortunately some very few games I couldn’t get to run with Linux, otherwise I had removed Windows a long time ago) but I never ran into this problem. Someone here wrote about efimgr, could be that I installed that by accident and this helps. I just followed some random tutorial back then.

    • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Did you try the tinkering recommendations on protonDB? They’re great. Might be able to help you if you hadn’t tried them.

      • RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Yes, I did. Most of the time that works, but there is one game which I absolutely love, Space Engineers, and I could not get that to work with any amount of tinkering.

        Edit: I just tried it again. Installation of Proton GE was necessary and had some hiccups. Used command line values from ProtonDB. Space Engineers kind of works now. Performance isn’t great though, some sudden FPS drops.

      • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Hey, drag. I can tell you that most people trying to switch from Windows to Linux do not want to sit there after a long day at work and tinker with stuff to just get a game running.

        Yesterday, after a 10 hour shift, I got home and tried to get WeMod working on my openSUSE Tumbleweed. I got home at 6 in the afternoon, and had been up since 6 that morning. It wasn’t until 9 PM that I was finally able to get WeMod working with Mass Effect Legendary Edition, thanks to the WeMod-launcher team over on GirHub.

        That means I was only able to play for maybe an hour before bed just because I wanted something that is as simple as double clicking on Windows, and playing.

        Now, I understand I’m an edge case, because I want to use cheats on my games. That’s just the general attitude I’ve seen when trying to get people to switch over myself.

        “Why isn’t my program working?”

        “Oh, yeah. Programs for Windows don’t work as they should. You have to do x and y and then sprinkle a little bit of z in this config file over here on this other other program”

        “What the fuck? That’s stupid.”

        “No man. It’s really cool once you start to understand!”

        “Please help me get my Windows back. I don’t want to bother with this, I just want to play my game / use my program”

        Literal conversation I’ve had.

        • RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I have to say, my experience with Linux gaming was much better. Most of the games I play work more or less immediately without any tinkering at all. Of course if you play games which are protected by kernel-level anticheat measures then you are pretty much out of luck at this time. And there are other edge cases like you mentioned.

          I think while glorifying the Linux gaming experience is wrong, it still has made enormous progress in the last years and it is worth a try for anyone who distrusts or dislikes Microsoft. Breaking monopolies isn’t easy, but I personally think it is necessary to regain ownership over rmy own hardware, even if it makes things a bit more complicated in the beginning.

          • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I couldn’t agree any more! I love Linux, and what it stands for, completely. I am trying my hardest to only stay on my Linux partition and find workarounds in the meantime time.

            I am happy that for the most part, games do work with minimal tweaking. I just want to bring edge cases like mine into the conversation because people will tell others who are fresh into the Linux space that’s it is nothing but sunshine and rainbows, but never admit that there are still very real limitations to what is available and what can and can not work that most normal people would want from their OS, which is ease of use.

            I understand we are in a bubble here, and we all know what it brings to the table, but for someone dipping their toes into it for the first time, they are being led to believe it’s really as simple as just installing a new OS and everything just works.

            That’s just not the reality as of right now, no matter if all of your games work or not. Not everyone else is going to have the same easy experience some of us have here, because they are wanting to use their computer for things like modding or cheats or use programs that don’t work with Linux very well such as ME3Tweaks to install mods onto Mass Effect for example, or Reloaded-II to install mods to Atlus games like Persona/Metaphor.

  • The Pantser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    EU must ban all US-made smart products for its own safety. All closed-source software and electronics that can be used for strategic manipulation and sabotage – Google, Apple, Amazon, all of it.

    Well this solves your first issue, Microsoft is US based. So just uninstall windows.

  • redxef@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    efibootmgr is your friend. Boot into linux and use it to set the boot records as you want, in the order that you want them.

    Also, I have heard from a bunch of people, that this can be mitigated by having separate EFI partitions for Linux and Windows. That means one EFI partition per physical drive. You can go as far as having the EFI partition on different media than the Linux install.