• 0 Posts
  • 45 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle
  • I don’t think you understand statistics well enough to speak on this.

    2016 Presidential Election – Predicted Clinton over Trump with 71.4%.

    The above for example was showing outcomes of simulations. Many polls reported way higher outcomes for Clinton and he was one of the few models showing a trump outcome and Trump’s path to victory was in the simulation results. This wasn’t a fail but a success of his model

    Like when you are told that in a coin flip, heads is the outcome 51% of the time and hear every coin flip will be heads









  • These arguments are exactly why people hate vegans. It’s nonsense.

    Not only do you jump to an insane straw man. You showcase that you ignore a clear increasing contradiction around your world view and choose reactionary nothing.

    If you care about life realize the harder question. If you care about the environment realize clear inefficiencues. Currently, you showcase nothing more than crude thoughtlessness.





  • mildlyusedbrain@lemmy.worldtotumblr@lemmy.worldSimples.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I think the way I would phrase it is that they are very consistent in their belief that there are clear lines for defining gender.

    But that view breaks down the moment their definitions have to engage with reality and they are faced with the difficulty of actually making thos classifications when faced with biological realities.