I don’t understand how you can’t see how every other point you make contradicts a previous point or quote you made to try and support your position but then I see the reddit-debate brain style of debate you engage in and it makes sense.
Not every detailed, line by line explanation to a dozen things mentioned is “reddit-debate brain style debate” - but I guess go off with your thought terminating cliche. I can’t wait to tell Lenin he was a Reddit debate bro that needed to cool off on the polemics. I’d suggest you just copy paste the contradicting points, which should be easy because you say there are so many of them, but you clearly won’t at this point.
I don’t understand your stance either, like are you happy China has allowed for further opening up of the healthcare sector, albeit as you note only in certain cities with conditions etc?
Does it make sense to you to do more opening up of healthcare now, when China is stronger, richer and more secure than ever before?
My stance is clear if you re-read what I wrote. It is clear and self contained in a simple linear fashion. Your reply meanders in some strange way that seems to imply that China’s healthcare is capitalistic, or that it isn’t, or maybe that it will be and is becoming more capitalistic, or maybe that it isn’t, who knows. I certainly can’t really tell by what you’ve written or the evidence you’ve presented because it seems to support all these stances all at once. It’s hard to tell if you actually believe whatever it is you are trying to present or if you don’t because of this contradictory incoherence in your reddit-brained attempt to gish-gallop every sentence I wrote individually. There is no thesis or antithesis in it. There is no dialectic. It’s complete liberal nonsense. Honestly, I’d expect a reply like yours to be from a Lemmy user, it’s that bad, and I’m not impressed by your feigning to not understand what I wrote in clear, plain English.
I don’t understand how you can’t see how every other point you make contradicts a previous point or quote you made to try and support your position but then I see the reddit-debate brain style of debate you engage in and it makes sense.
Not every detailed, line by line explanation to a dozen things mentioned is “reddit-debate brain style debate” - but I guess go off with your thought terminating cliche. I can’t wait to tell Lenin he was a Reddit debate bro that needed to cool off on the polemics. I’d suggest you just copy paste the contradicting points, which should be easy because you say there are so many of them, but you clearly won’t at this point.
I don’t understand your stance either, like are you happy China has allowed for further opening up of the healthcare sector, albeit as you note only in certain cities with conditions etc?
Does it make sense to you to do more opening up of healthcare now, when China is stronger, richer and more secure than ever before?
My stance is clear if you re-read what I wrote. It is clear and self contained in a simple linear fashion. Your reply meanders in some strange way that seems to imply that China’s healthcare is capitalistic, or that it isn’t, or maybe that it will be and is becoming more capitalistic, or maybe that it isn’t, who knows. I certainly can’t really tell by what you’ve written or the evidence you’ve presented because it seems to support all these stances all at once. It’s hard to tell if you actually believe whatever it is you are trying to present or if you don’t because of this contradictory incoherence in your reddit-brained attempt to gish-gallop every sentence I wrote individually. There is no thesis or antithesis in it. There is no dialectic. It’s complete liberal nonsense. Honestly, I’d expect a reply like yours to be from a Lemmy user, it’s that bad, and I’m not impressed by your feigning to not understand what I wrote in clear, plain English.
You said there are many examples of contradictory points. You’ve posted none when challenged.
An exercise in futility when you’ve openly stated you are unable to understand a simple thesis I write in plain English.