• corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Libre Office.

      Honestly - and flame away - I hate the name. I hate saying it. It’s the ‘moist’ of borrowed words. Leeeeeeeebr. And I’m a Canadian who did French up to university-level conversational “explain something for 20 min” French (from a gorgeous caribbean dynamo teacher, but I justif–uh, digress) so I know how to say the word and what it means.

      And I still hate it. I’m a horrible person – even before I continued French study because the prof was so engaging and energetic and brightened every room and every day and made French interesting just on inclusion.

      • john89@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        I feel bad for canadians learning french. It’s a language that’s only useful in like, 1.5 places in the world.

        I genuinely believe french canadians are hurting their next generation by filling their heads with nonsense of a dying culture. Kind of like how racists fill their kids’ heads with garbage because they’re afraid of becoming irrelevant.

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Glad I’m not the only one questioning the name! I have a pet theory that if they changed it it’d be more popular.

    • Laser@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      If smart people love libreoffice, then I must be dumb. Working with it always seems weird and I never like it.

      Fortunately, I can use LaTeX for work; it is far from without issues but while being arcane sometimes (especially when tables are involved), it never really upsets me and the result looks very good. I can say neither for libreoffice or MS office. But at least the former doesn’t charge for the experience.

      I hope typst gains more traction; it seems really intuitive compared to TeX and you don’t necessarily need a macro package. And while it doesn’t produce the quality of TeX-based systems yet, it is already good. Then again, Knuth’s goal first and foremost goal was quality (and it shows); the system just had to be usable by him.