• itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Because he paid for his influence while China is not. They are “stealing data” they have not paid for and are competing with the NSA/FBI/CIA without sharing.

  • Dupree878@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Just something to think about when it comes to the influence social media has on society

    TikTok has already transformed how Americans communicate, influencing language and behavior in ways that may have broader implications. The Chinese government, known for using censorship and language control to maintain social order and suppress dissent, leverages euphemistic language as a tool for manipulating public opinion and silencing critical discourse.

    Phrases like “unalive” for suicide or “grape” for rape dilute the meaning and impact of language, making it easier for powerful entities to control narratives and obscure uncomfortable truths. This process, known as “language laundering” or “semantic bleaching,” strips words of their emotional weight and original meaning, making it harder to address sensitive or urgent issues effectively.

    This trend has extended beyond language to visuals, with people obscuring letters or censoring words in pictures and posts—using terms like “s**cide” or “r*pe.” While this may help users navigate algorithms designed to suppress certain keywords, it completely erodes the clarity and impact of critical conversations.

    The normalization of this behavior on TikTok has permeated Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, and other social media platforms, spreading a culture of diluted language and indirect communication. These practices hinder meaningful discourse, desensitize users to serious issues, and ultimately make it more challenging to engage with sensitive topics in a direct and effective manner. Recognizing and resisting this shift is essential to preserving the integrity of public discussions and fostering authentic engagement.

    • Venator@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Seems like meta were trying something similar with thier replacing all links in Facebook messenger with thier fbrpc://facebook/nativethirdparty?app_id Links, but seems like they gave up on it because it was all broken.

      • kibiz0r@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yup. They’re all dangerous monsters.

        IMO, it doesn’t even matter who’s worse, cuz they’re all bad enough they should all be subject to aggressive regulation with the goal of establishing safe interop off-ramps for people to stop using the services or at least use more trustworthy clients.

        In my estimation, TikTok is worse, but that’s not even what the ban is about. It’s because China is spying instead of the US. That’s not a reason to defend TikTok though, or to oppose the government’s decision — cuz they were accidentally right, for the wrong reason.

        • 0ops@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 hours ago

          That’s where I’m at. If in an alternate universe Congress did something like banning the distribution of harvested data, even just to foreign entities, and TikTok then refused to comply, then I’d be fully in support with them getting banned for it.

          Here in the real world though, Congress apparently doesn’t have the balls to pass blanket privacy rights like that, because you see, that’d catch some of the wrong fish. I think it says a lot about the state of modern social media that all they were willing to go after TikTok for was something as nebulous as “national security risk”.

  • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This was never about national security. It’s about money. Most of congress owns Meta stock and meta lobbied the fuck out of trying to get the app banned. It’s extremely annoying that people buy this crap about national security.

    Ask yourself when in the history of our country did 85% of congress agree on something? 85% of these fuckwads agreed that banning this app is more important than literally anything else. Stopping school shooting, fixing our economy, providing affordable healthcare or housing, are all not important.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Ask yourself when in the history of our country did 85% of congress agree on something?

      Patriot Act and other government spying laws of course.

    • Drusas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      No, he’s just a beneficiary of apartheid. Even Patrick Bateman knew we needed to end that.

    • Drusas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      That’s not relevant to the argument about how they could be dangerous for national security.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I wouldn’t be so sure about that. The CEO has a prominent seat at Trump’s inauguration.

      • leadore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yep. Which means TikTok gave Thumper a load of dough and TikTok will be allowed to continue operating here. Zuck is probably not happy since he’d also given him a load of dough to get rid of TikTok.

        pops corn

    • OsrsNeedsF2P
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      A fatal mistake for companies who want to do business in the US

  • sevan@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I suspect its being banned because of people using it in public without headphones or earbuds. I was submitted to that experience for an hour+ in a waiting room one time and now I fully supported the ban to prevent it from ever happening again.

      • Drusas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Have you met people? They are unpredictable. You might get shot just for asking somebody politely to turn off their speaker.

        In fact, I was once on a bus where somebody got stabbed because they asked some guy to stop playing music through his boombox (yes, I’m old).

          • Drusas@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Yeah…

            I think people are likely to be as violent in most countries, but usually they have to use knives or acid or something like that. For what it’s worth, I would far rather be shot than have acid thrown on me.

            But yeah. It’s a realistic thing that you have to take into account that you could be shot if you anger somebody.

  • gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Serious answer: because it’s owned by a US citizen and is operated and HQ’d in the US, so the the US government has effectively full control over it and can monitor it.

    That’s not a lot better from an end user privacy and security point. But is wayyyyyyyyyy better from a national security standpoint.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      The US government has no more control over X than regulations permit. They have the exact same amount of control over TikTok operations inside the US.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Sweet summer nothing. Don’t mistake billionaires as patriots for any cause other than their own. They don’t care about the country and will only cooperate if forced or convenient. Which is the exact same level TikTok exists on.

      • Drusas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Despite allegedly being an illegal immigrant himself, he does have citizenship now.

        • nieminen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Should be an invalid citizenship, he falsely stayed in the us under a student visa while he did business, and didn’t attend school

          • snooggums@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            He should absolutely have his citizenship revoked and be deported because we have it on record that he knew he falsely stayed for his personal benefit.

            I will cut less well off immigrants slack for not following the complex and difficult process, especially if they immigrated for asylum, but Musk did it because he could get away with it and deserves to be punished for it.

  • Jo Miran
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    10 hours ago

    They are all problematic. My disagreement with the removal of TikTok is that it should not stop with TikTok. Meta’s apps are an absolute nightmare. Google, Xitter, Amazon, etc., they all need to be curbed when it comes to data collection.

    Data brokering needs to be made illegal or VERY tightly regulated.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      they all need to be curbed when it comes to data collection.

      The problem with TikTok isn’t data collection, though. The stated concern of the US government is that TikTok may be used to inflict foreign influence (ie, Woke Mind Virus Communism).

      That is, incidentally, why the flood of users to RedNote has been so funny. TikTok’s got a bunch of edgy western Zoomers doing “Did You Know Capitalism Is Bad Sometimes?” infographics in between dances. RedNote is just straight up “China Is The Best Country In The World” nature channel style hagiography.

      The US pushed millions of Americans out of the frying pan and directly into the fire.

      • lobut@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I don’t understand. Twitter was definitely used for that and Musk was “paying” to have people vote republican in Pennsylvania.

        Meta paid like 800 million for the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

        So like, if they sold to a US company then they’d get wrist slapped too?

      • ofcourse
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Yes, the ban of TikTok has been more about lip service than actual protections for Americans.

        The real solution is passing a comprehensive law that fines/bans any app/platform that is opaque about its influence from governments and its data sharing with governments. But who in Congress today has any appetite for real solutions!

        I had written about this to my reps and their response was a non response - TikTok bad.

  • Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I find it funny that if TikTok was sold to an American it wouldn’t be a security risk anymore.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      10 hours ago

      that was literally the whole fucking point.

      is it me or did Lemmy fill up with the most oblivious users all of a sudden?

    • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Exactly. I find it hilarious how some of these people conclude that China ONLY gets our data because of TikTok, when our own government and on soil companies sell and shares our data as long as the other (China even lmao) buy it from them. No issues as long as they get money, but if they don’t get the money, it’s “national security” risk.

        • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I know… it’s the things I’ve been trying to drum on about every time someone’s says it’s a “security” risk. No one cares though, because “TikTok” bad. :/

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      They would then be under US jurisdiction, that’s the issue with TikTok, the US can’t for them to comply with any laws, current or future.

      • Crikeste@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        No, the issue with Tik Tok is that the government can’t control it like it does Facebook, Twitter, etc.

        There is nothing in China that can harm you as much as the American Government. No intention, no action, no belief will ever hurt you as much as America has.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          They can’t control it because… It’s not located in the USA! Good job, you understood what I said!

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Bullshit. Any country has jurisdiction over companies operating inside it’s borders. If what you say is true then we couldn’t even ban TikTok.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Who exactly do you expect them to sue if a website has no physical presence inside the US borders and it disobeys US laws? 🤔

          The only thing they can truly do against TikTok is prevent people from downloading the app through official means and having ISPs blocking the website. Outside of that it could 100% continue operating and scraping user data to send it to China.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            TikTok does have US offices and employees though.

            And yeah if they’re blocked in the app stores, and by ISPs you’d have to side load it onto your phone and tunnel out with a VPN. 170 million Americans aren’t doing that. You’d be lucky to find 100,000 willing to do it.

            And since even SCOTUS laughed at the espionage argument, we again need to bring up that China just buys the exact same data from Meta, Alphabet, and X. We aren’t securing anything.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      because then they’d be subject to all the bullshit the feds do and required to comply.

      • jfrnz@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Like what? What are American companies required to do to protect your privacy that TikTok doesn’t do because they are a Chinese company?

          • jfrnz@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Fine, what national security obligations are US-based social media companies meeting that TikTok/ByteDance is not?

            • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 hours ago

              TikTok/bytedance are controlled by a rival country. US based companies can, of course, help our rivals too but there’s some degree of separation that makes it a bit harder to address/discover.

  • peregrin5@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    176
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    They are both security risks. The difference is the SA oligarch has already successfully infiltrated our national security and installed himself in a position of power so we can’t do anything about it anymore.

    Honestly the way he did it was pretty perfect. Create technology and weapons and R&D for the country you want to infiltrate, ingratiate yourself to it’s people, government, and military. Then start throwing money into politics to buy yourself a spot on the cabinet.

    This is a game any bad state actor with a huge wad of cash can play thanks to Citizen’s United.

    • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Create

      I think you mean buy. Fund is probably the most generous word you could use, but that’s a fat stretch.

        • snooggums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          39
          ·
          11 hours ago

          He founded Space X, but he did not create the technology and do the R&D alone like Tony Stark. He got the funding though.

          • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Who ever claimed he created the technology? That makes no sense at all. And SpaceX got funding from NASA, just like a lot of other aerospace companies. In terms of value they delivered for that money, they’re far ahead of the competition. Boeing got more money for Starliner than SpaceX got for Crew Dragon. And look how that turned out.

            • snooggums@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              24
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Who ever claimed he created the technology?

              The initial comment in this thread:

              Honestly the way he did it was pretty perfect. Create technology and weapons and R&D for the country you want to infiltrate, ingratiate yourself to it’s people, government, and military. Then start throwing money into politics to buy yourself a spot on the cabinet.

              This is what was being responded to.

    • frostysauce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The government can’t control the narrative with it. Specifically the tipping point when they decided to ban it was when they realized people were free to call the genocide in Gaza a genocide without the US being able to overwhelm the platform with pro-Israel propaganda.