ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agoPar for the courseslrpnk.netimagemessage-square212fedilinkarrow-up11.36Karrow-down114
arrow-up11.35Karrow-down1imagePar for the courseslrpnk.netByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square212fedilink
minus-squareSenal@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoI provided you with a very basic example in which your “mathematical impossibility” breaks down. So far you’ve stated that there were only two possible interpretations of a statement and then followed up with “mathematical impossibility”. You are correct though, you can’t reason with someone who didn’t use reason to get to their conclusions. Saves me some time, good luck.
I provided you with a very basic example in which your “mathematical impossibility” breaks down.
So far you’ve stated that there were only two possible interpretations of a statement and then followed up with “mathematical impossibility”.
You are correct though, you can’t reason with someone who didn’t use reason to get to their conclusions.
Saves me some time, good luck.