• aceshigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Good. At least someone is saying something. More people and companies should voice their opinion.

  • Loce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Brasil, please ban facebook. First twitter then facebook. Fuck the gready corporate assholes. Someone needs to make a first step and create a precedent, we need this. Social media will be (already is) the downfall of our civilization.

  • OneMeaningManyNames
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Meta’s anti-LGBT rules are closely knit to their ending the fact-checking: It is science denialism and linked to racism and vaccine skepticism.

    Homosexuality and gender identity are not considered mental illnesses, Sex is not a binary, and Race is not connected to intelligence.

    Bigots never liked science on these three, and now they use political power to impose their narrative.

    Meta never moderated such discourse. Nor reddit nor twitter nor youtube. There was no censorship to end here. What this is, it is a free pass to punch down trans and gay people. It is incitement to violence, and Zuckerberg and Musk must go to the gallows for it.

    Don’t get me started on the toxic harassment these platforms have allowed against African and Carribean reparation activists, how they have destroyed the lives of feminists, and how they have named all Palestinians terrorists.

    At this point race realists and gender essentialists have ensured political and technological control of the narrative.

    There is no room for debating sealioning trolls on this one. If they don’t understand the social dynamics against gender/sex/minorities at this moment, they are no better than brownshirts.

    It is permabans and hooks and jabs all the way, for every single weird freak that backs this deranged hateful shit.

    • themurphy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      138
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Yeah, they found out they could win, when they stuck it to X and straight up banned them until they complied.

      Just like the big tech companies have different ToS for EU consumers.

      Mad respect to them, but it should be normal. But it’s not.

      • lolrightythen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Also like California passing public health laws and companies deciding it is easier to comply to the entire U.S. instead of duplicating product lines.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      All the BRICS have. Brazil just stands out, because its not a country we’ve flagged as “Evil Enemy Run By Inhuman Savages”.

      • cygnus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        63
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It also helps that unlike the R and the C in BRICS, they aren’t imperialists threatening and/or invading their neighbours. Brazil is a good world citizen.

      • ShinkanTrain
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        because its not a country we’ve flagged as “Evil Enemy Run By Inhuman Savages”.

        Unless the subject is Amazon deforestation, in which case we have to stop these inhuman savages from destroying this global patrimony (mine). Please don’t ask who’s buying the cattle and soy being grown there or running the mining companies or where I got all this fertile land.

        • mke@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Reminds me of people who said Amazon deforestation warranted a “military intervention.” Hey, be funny is trumpet added another country to his want-to-invade list, wouldn’t it? Yet folks still feel bothered when I say people in rich countries don’t really care all that much about poorer ones.

    • octopus_ink
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      It’s not on my 2025 bingo card I’ll admit, but I’m here for it.

  • naeap@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    124
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Giving 72h to reply on a Friday is a nice touch ;⁠-⁠)

    • deus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Enjoy it while it lasts. We like to immitate the US so in 2026 it’s very likely that we’ll elect a reactionary idiot again.

  • blueamigafan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Never in my wildest dreams did I imagine Brazil apparently propping up the internet, but huge swathes of twitter shutdown when Brazil banned it a while back, for a short time.

    • Monomate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      71
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s easy to be bold when the US president is weak. I don’t think they’d ban X if Trump was president at the time.

      • forrgott@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 hours ago

        So strong he needs both hands to drink a glass of water?

        Or is it the way he literally shits himself in the middle of a rally? Oh wait, of course! Cause the only thing strong about that dementia riddled moron is his stench.

        Imagine looking at Trump and thinking, “Wow, him strong!” Fucking weird, I tell ya what…

  • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    8 hours ago

    According to the extrajudicial notice, this allows users to associate sexual identity to “a mental illness or abnormality” and allows “the defense of professional limitations based on gender.”

    Why does anyone associate with this site. It’s beyond me.

  • CodandChips @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Brazil gives Meta 72 hours to explain new fact-check policies>

    Meta: we don’t have any

    • OsrsNeedsF2P
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They do, tho. It’s community notes. If multiple people agree on a correction, especially if those people usually disagree with eachother, it becomes the note