• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 minutes ago

      Not just social issues.

      It’s easier if people quit than you firing them.

      So do shit like this so people “protest resign” and fill their positions with H1B’s who can’t resign because they’d be deported and take a fraction of the pay.

      Resigning in protest is never a good idea.

      Stay, obstruct, make them fire you.

  • droopy4096@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    we can only hope fb implodes sooner rather than later. I personally know multiple people working there who are very decent human beings who need to pay bills. I just hope their current trajectory will force employee action and paralyze fb long enough to hurt. Unlike other places it’s not so simple to just hire a load of IT professionals and have any meaningful results short term, esp. if they have not been ramped up to speed by their colleagues. So it’s not impossible, bowever tolerance threshold is kind of high for any action to take place. Wads of cash, unpaid mortgages and all. Employees of big tech are truly living in gold cages…

    • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 hours ago

      With meta on your resume you can easily find employment or freelance. Tech people have widely applicable and desired skills. Hell they could even move to a non 3rd world country and be better off.

      • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Yes but at Facebook they make more money, and money speaks louder than morals 🤡 I’m not sorry for the people working at Facebook. They are part of the problem. Facebook didn’t just suddenly become evil yesterday.

        • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I recently quit facebook due to rampant russian propaganda, unmoderated communities full of far left or far right (same thing really) bots and constant, rampant scams and ai posts. It’s not that platform has it, any platform with 5 digit userbase has them. It is that FB has used it consistently across all their platforms to drive “”“”“engagement”“”".

  • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Five people interviewed….

    “It’s total chaos!!!”

    I despise Facebook as much as the next person, but sensationalism hurts more than it helps.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 hours ago

      “Internal conversations and five people interviewed.”

      Let’s be honest. For current employees, it’s probably 10-100 times that. If my company did something controversial and then the press asked me for a reaction, I’d say “no comment” like it’s my catch phrase. Unless you already have a job lined up (that can’t be undone by “badmouthing your employer”), no one’s being open and truthful.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Imagine this being your red line. Your totally prepared to work at Facebook, because there’s absolutely nothing dodgy about that, but suddenly his transphobia is a problem.

    • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Well, Frances Haugen left a while ago. Some people did go.

      And, well, the best time to leave Facebook was to never join. The second best time is now.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It’s ok to let their platform spread misinformation and hatred that affects millions, but it’s not OK when that comes back and bites them in the ass.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    LMAO, employees are about to find out why a union would be a good idea. Gotta speedrun growing class consciousness.

  • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    239
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Major props to those causing a ruckous internally there. That said, they likely fully expected a backlash and likely didn’t care. Anyone who cares can be replaced by another sycophant, at a reduced salary even.

    • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      You get what you pay for. They’ll be drawing from “the best of the rest” in a dwindling pool.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        They don’t need the very best to make profit for a very long time, especially in a friendly regulatory regime. Check IBM for reference.

        They own the social media market and have enough capital to acquire any plausible competitor, as have done in the past.

        Losing top talent is only a significant price to pay if the firm or its competitors are still building new stuff that affects their bottom line. Meta is happy raking in the social media-ad profits. Google is happy raking in the search-ad profits. They’re all busy getting more money out of the markets they’ve monopolized, not competing.

      • azron
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        12 hours ago

        They pay well enough to get anyone who doesn’t care about principles. Plenty people in tech like that.

  • GladiusB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Fecesbook is crap. Crap take from a crappy data salesman with nothing but crap to sell. I can’t wait until it eats itself from all the bots.

  • Soup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Man they’re not even doing the dog-whistle thing anymore, huh? Fucking disgusting, I hope he experiences the everlasting warmth of a car fire in the near future.

  • 1luv8008135@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Gee I wonder why he’s suddenly decided to start moving parts of the business to Texas… little Musk-ette over here…

    All of this is very likely to kiss the ring of Herr Trump

  • misk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Meta was already enabling genocide in third world countries and countless other things but this is what caused chaos. Those employees have weird priorities, huh?

    [edit] reworded slightly on the account of caused controversy

    • deathbird@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Not like they’re a bunch of committed leftists working there.

      Which is more likely to impact a Meta employee personally?

    • mke@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      In fairness, do we know for certain what happened in Facebook back then? Maybe some employees did protest, maybe they’re the same people protesting now, even. Or they quit. Thing is, LGBT issues make engaging articles. Third world suffering? Eh, it depends.

      Yet, I agree with the overall point because this is the crux of the matter: on average, one of these simply matters more—one way or another, see transphobes cheering—for people of this subgroup. This is us.

      The usual notes apply: good on them for protesting, big media isn’t helping, fully ethical employment is like fully ethical consumption.

    • Gordito@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Ah yes, the “old news theory”…

      -They’ve done it already, why call them out again? It’s old news.

      While they escalate and continue to go full-on hate for profit.

      • spujb@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        13 hours ago

        i was with you at first but upon rethinking i do think it’s fair to note that there was little to no internal uproar in meta over the myanmar and othe situations. of course there was uproar outside meta. when they said “weird priorities” they meant from meta employees specifically—not progressive or leftist voices in general.

        hope me describing my train of thoughts helps :)

      • morrowind
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago
        1. They haven’t done “it” because it’s a different thing
        2. OP did not say not to call it out again, simply ask us to consider why this thing caused more chaos than others
    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Still, it’s good to see there are people there who won’t just go along with anything.

  • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    14 hours ago

    i think I’ve finally reached peak zuckerberg, i don’t want to read one more thing about facebook or meta or whatever