Meta sneakily introduced “Platform Integrity Attestation API” which basically calls home to see whether the user has a valid license to play.

This means that to run apps user has to have online connection to perform an integrity test. Whether it’s only a test on launch or continues call home like Denuvo-like DRMs is not yet clear. This could also mean that modified headsets could fail to pass this test essentially closing down the device for modifications that could damage “platform integrity”. Not all details are clear yet but this doesn’t look good.

Currently it’s optional and up to app developers to enable it.

    • archchan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      ·
      1 year ago

      My consideration was off the table after Facebook bought Oculus.

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      1 year ago

      I always wanted one, but when they made it a requirement to have and link a Facebook account to use it I completely lost interest.

      • HughJanus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I have one. Not long after I bought it, it became a brick because it forced a software update that forced a Facebook sign in to use it.

          • HughJanus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Will I never picked it up again to find out.

              • HughJanus
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Nah I’m good. Not really that cool anyway after a few hours.

                Maybe one day I’ll get a Valve Index.

              • Corhen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                still think people complaing about this is weird. Like, they made this change, and removed the facebook integration, and people still act like this is the case.

      • Steeve@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        They took that out a while ago, that’s when I picked up the Quest 2. Honestly, it’s the best PCVR headset out there, and this article has nothing to do with PCVR, just their own platform. This won’t affect your ability to pirate PCVR games at all.

    • NounsAndWords@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      It seems (seemed) like a pretty good vr headset…just it’s owned by one of the worst companies and I have no interest paying them hundreds for that level of access to my personal information.

  • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    All the shills promised me and other doubters that something like this would never happen. I’m glad I lost all interest in Oculus the moment Facebook bought them.
    Hopefully we’ll see some solid info on the Deckard this year.

    • keeb420@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same. And it’s sad because, from what others have said, they are great vr headsets. Hopefully valve nails it with Deckard.

  • straF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    1 year ago

    So glad I avoid Meta products. I doubt they will be satisfied until they can live sell your data and display ads while you use the product.

    • Steeve@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Those are two very different things. Advertising giants don’t actually “sell” your data, it’s really not in their best interest, they make money by being the only ones with your data.

      • cottard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        So… they sell, lease, etc either your data or some value added bullshit services or products based on your data for a higher price due to monopoly?

        • Steeve@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No, they sell advertment slots to advertisers with promise of higher ad interaction, a promise they can keep because they target those advertisements to users that are more likely to interact with them using user data. User data isn’t sold, leased, whatever you want to call it.

          Also, technically not entirely a monopoly because there are quite a few tech giants that operate like this. Oligopoly would be the correct term.

  • 𝐘Ⓞz҉@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Who the fuck are buying shit from google and Facebook? No wonder fucking internet is going to shits

          • scutiger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not “unrooting” it’s just preventing your OS from being replaced. It’s an easy change for anyone with physical access to the device who can get past the lock screen, but can’t be done by accident. So you won’t be accidentally installing malicious software that will reinstall your OS, for example.

            The unlock/lock and install can be done through a website, but it requires your phone to be plugged in to a computer, and you can enable/disable unlocking through the developer menu in the phone’s settings.

            • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You can also use the standard android CLI tools to lock and unlock the bootloader, but that web app is really convenient.

              Edit: and for anyone wondering, you can re-lock it with any ROM, or after rooting (you don’t lose root). I’m running grapheneos with a locked bootloader. Only difference between this and the stock ROM is a message that’s displayed when you boot that warns you the phone isn’t stock.

      • HughJanus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They’re also absolutely the best phones you can buy, in my opinion.

        And you literally can’t buy phones that don’t have anti-consumer software.

        No one sells the old Nokia bricks, and even if they did, the networks they run on have been deprecated.

    • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      The quest is amazing. It’s cheap and completely standalone while also giving you the ability to use it with pc vr games.

      • Graphine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you got a good PC for VR the Quest is great to use. I played HL Alyx on it which was incredible.

        But the DRM BS though…at this point the Pico is looking better for standalone use

        • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          What DRM BS? This article? I’ve explained why it’s a whole bunch of fear mongering. There have been apps and games that require always online long before this api came around.

    • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m also glad I’ve kept my quest isolated from the internet once I enabled dev mode (for oculess). I’ve noticed it tries to connect to IP addresses owned by Meta (according to whois), without any dns queries involved. Your pihole won’t be able to block that… I went a few steps farther and set up a dedicated wifi network that only allows local traffic. Then I set up a http proxy (squid) that only allows connections to certain websites. I mostly use the quest for PCVR though, so the proxy doesn’t get much use.

      And thanks for sharing oculuskiller! I’ve been looking for something like that for a while.

  • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Liiiiiitle bit of an outrage attempting title.

    The API is being added, it’s optional for developers, and the person that is quoted in the article even says that it’s not really going to be used for that.

    Also there’s never been anything stopping developers from making their games “always online” to begin with, so this changes nothing.

    This is like saying steam requires always online simply because an api exists for online checking drm.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not a fair comparison to Steam as it allows indefinite-ish offline access as long as you check in once. This new Quest restriction has nothing like this. It’s more similar to DRM systems like Denuvo that call home on startup or during play time. The API also checks device integrity which means access to apps could be disabled for modified devices and Steam does nothing of sort.

      • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The comparison was that the ability to enforce always online exists in steam, just like it will here. Neither will mandate it.

        The ability to do this isn’t only being added now, it’s just that meta have made an api for it that developers can use if they want instead of writing their own.

        • Dr. Moose@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Honestly I’m not as optimistic as you are. Official API gives implicit permission for DRM. Right now if an APP did this it would be review bombed and suffer backslash. With official API it’ll slowly normalizes DRM and suddenly everything requires online.

          Quest is getting more closed with every release - remember when Facebook login was not required? The whole dev ecosystem is getting more complex with every update. This seems like an up-coming trend especially now that Quests main competition will be an extremely closed ecosystem of Apple. This will give Quest permision to basically lock down more.

          My bet is that a year in most of the apps will have this DRM though I’d love to be proven wrong. I love my Quest 2 and only use it to draw/sculpt when I travel and that would basically kill the device for me so I might be a bit over protective of my hobby here but it really sucks when you buy a thing and somebody else tells you how to use it.

          • EatMyDick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            20
            ·
            1 year ago

            Only the nerds care. There is DRM on every damn platform or there except gog and nobody cares because it works fine and they aren’t the users who just want to steal.

            You hear about a shitty DRM implementation like once a year. This is all just noise from pirates.

                • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Hey did you steal that? Did you steal that? Is that stolen? No don’t block my line of sight I need to see if you stole that. Did you steal that? Did you steal that?

                  What a consumer experience.

            • scutiger@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              “Noise from pirates” is bullshit. Pirates generally tend to have a better experience with their media than legal users.

            • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              They’re plenty of people who complain about it when it doesn’t work, but they don’t know why it doesn’t work, they’re just annoyed it doesn’t.

    • Corhen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      yea, this article is intentionally rage baiting. I hate meta as much as the next guy, but 1) im shocked there wasnt any DRM for their apps already, and b) this just opens an API for apps.

      Im just not going to buy games with DRM, same as steam.

    • MurrayL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, but people love finding new reasons to rant about Meta (as if there weren’t enough already)

  • cyberpunk007@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Aaaaaaaaaand just like that, never buying a Facebook headset. Also because apparently they firmware updated to requiring a Facebook account.

    Meh.

    I’ll go valve index 2.0

  • _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Sounds pretty on-brand for them.

    Remember kids: Meta = cancer

    Do everything you can to stop meta from metastasizing.

  • GustavoM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We’ve reached a point that technology is not improving, but degrading – who on earth is going to accept this as is and let third parties acquire random information about them, including their credit card? I mean, if a hacker manages to bust (whatever feature that allows this bs to happen) and forward info to them instead of the meta HQ – they are going to have a heck of a honeypot.