• Signtist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because you stated 2 things as if they were fact, and I know at least one of them is wrong. It’s okay not to know things, but definitively saying something is true when it’s clearly not true proves that you state unfounded ideas as if they were facts, which can and should undermine people’s trust in the validity of all definitive statements you make.

      • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        But all you discovered is that I’m human! if you don’t think you do this then i trust you even less than the avg human

        • Signtist@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Some humans are more trustworthy than others. Even the difference between “I think fire is cold” and “Fire is cold” is immense. To err is to be human, but to err with complete confidence shows that you’re a little too comfortable with erring.