• GissaMittJobb
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Is this satire?

      If not, who would you say is the dictator of Vietnam?

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        Dictatorship doesn’t imply that there’s only a single ruler.

        That said the situation, as in the power of the Politburo, isn’t as extreme as it was in the USSR or in Vietnam before 1988. But they still have ways to go before they’re at Cuban levels of “wait we’ll have to take a closer look they might actually have come up with a form of democracy constitutionally different from the usual ones”. Cuba is still authoritarian but that seems to be more cultural inertia than tankie ideology. Singapore might actually be a good comparison, not economically but politically.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Technically correct, which is the most tone-deaf kind of correct.

        • tht@social.pwned.page
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          9 days ago

          Stateless, moneyless society, if it has money or a state then its not communist, its socialist, big difference

          • vga@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            One is an eternal pipe-dream the other a failure.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Communist is an adjective, and it’s right there in their name:

        Under the constitution, the Communist Party of Vietnam (CPV) asserts their role in all branches of the country’s politics and society.

        While the country may not be strictly communist, the adjective is absolutely appropriate to describe its ruling party, which is the only party allowed and therefore it’s valid to refer to the entire government by that adjective.

        You’re just being obtuse…