SineNomineAnonymousM to IWW and syndicalismEnglish · 11 days agoCourt rejects Starbucks’ challenge to US labor board, ruling it illegally fired baristaswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square1fedilinkarrow-up1159arrow-down10
arrow-up1159arrow-down1external-linkCourt rejects Starbucks’ challenge to US labor board, ruling it illegally fired baristaswww.theguardian.comSineNomineAnonymousM to IWW and syndicalismEnglish · 11 days agomessage-square1fedilink
minus-squaremoistclump@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 days agoI was wondering how much the back pay would be and if they also have to pay any kind of damages. All I see is: … rejected Starbucks’ claim it need not rehire the baristas with back pay… Is that enough to deter this behaviour in the future? Would those baristas actually benefit from returning to work in such a hostile environment?
I was wondering how much the back pay would be and if they also have to pay any kind of damages. All I see is:
Is that enough to deter this behaviour in the future? Would those baristas actually benefit from returning to work in such a hostile environment?