The ole saying… Oh Ben Franklin how you have aged so well

  • hotspur
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I know they’ve said they don’t have the capacity to take on the really big tax cheats (ie the same people that pay lobbyists and gift politicians with trips and gifts), but recovering one or two of their dodged taxes alone would probably cover every gig worker who’s ever underpaid taxes.

    Of course, that would only make sense if you thought the IRS’ primary function was to fairly enforce taxation and mutual support of our shared govt—whereas the older I get, the more it seems to me that it serves as a social disciplining function and a lever to adjust social mobility. If your have enough money, you never have to worry about them.

      • hotspur
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Well, maybe so, but so far they’re going after… gig workers

          • hotspur
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 minutes ago

            That’s certainly a start but only 1.7 billion of that is listed as explicitly “high-income” unpaid debt. Even if you were to assume the 4.7 billion was entirely from high income, which I doubt, it’s still dwarfed by estimates of the missing taxes from the 1%. Per this fast co article an estimate of 168 billion per year is evaded by the top 1%. That’s 28% of the total evaded tax revenue estimate of 600billion. I’d speculate that if you included grey area practices for sheltering and hiding money, that liability would grow substantially.

            I fully understand the IRS is understaffed and has been choked for funding, my general point is that this is deliberate, and meant to force them to focus on recoverable things like gig workers as opposed to the very wealthy who can hold them off with lawyers and clever accountants. If it were possible for them to go after these people, that would be the most rational use of their time—when I need to free up space on a hard drive or email acct, I target the largest files and attachments first.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      They won’t. This is only the companies reporting to IRS. However as long as they get away with calling it contracting work, it’s up to the individual

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          The problem is contract work is based on the assumption they are contracting out to a separate company to do their work. That company is responsible for paying its employees and doing their taxes properly. It really doesn’t fit gig work, but companies like uber have a big cost advantage by pretending it does.

          • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            yeah honestly they should not allow non w2 contract. If someone wants to independently contract they should need to form an llc. This would cut down on the bs as gig work would have to do w2 as there is no way to make it simple for the workers to all become llc’s.

  • Donkter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s been known by employers for a while. I worked for an event catering gig for a summer or two and talking to the bosses they were well aware that the IRS was going from one gig in the state to another. For instance the year before my boss’s profession got hit, all of the places that hired golf caddies were audited all at once.