A man famous for having a morphable, changing face looks different in two different photos. Say it ain’t so.
- 1 Post
- 1.65K Comments
And lots of Walmarts “expenses” that they take out of their profit go into property rental and acquisition, I would venture to say it’s one of if not the largest percentage of their expenses, much like my apartment is.
That’s the problem with a C- in economics. If you sit behind that person and decide you’re going to just try to write the opposite of what they do you’re going to get an F
Donkter@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•This App Warns You if Someone Is Wearing Smart Glasses Nearby - 404mediaEnglish
6·12 days agoYes. You should have to censor yourself for neighbors and peers to have a functioning society. You should not have to do it for corporations. The line is pretty cut and dry and we should fight to keep it.
Donkter@lemmy.worldto
Not The Onion@lemmy.world•Phoebe Gates wants her $185 million AI startup to succeed with 'no ties to my privilege or my last name': 'I have a chip on my shoulder' | FortuneEnglish
3·13 days agoReal question: what on earth does “on the street” mean in the tech startup world? Because I have a strong suspicion that “on the street” means just going to work a normal job like 300 million other people even despite personal anecdotes of one or two people who literally became homeless.
Donkter@lemmy.worldto
TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name@lemmy.world•Acceptable loss.
18·14 days agoHaving watched TNG without being influenced by the community. I agree that his character starts pretty obnoxious, but I always got the sense that the point of his character was that his inclusion on the ship as a kid raised by this future world was just as “alien” as Data or Worf. Then again, it was also obvious that he occasionally got completely brain bonked for some episodes in order to make him the naive child of the group.
Now on principal the first person is wrong. But it does depend on what they found…
You could write a cool metaphor in which it’s obvious that time travel is able to fix everything, but billionaires and their government shills insists that some bad things have to happen (only to their enemies) and they have to control it.
This is real. Despite being comfortable being single it still draws looks when I go out and do things by myself. Getting told “it’s sad” when I go to a bar alone to read a book only hurts because I’m getting called sad by a weirdo, not because I felt bad about going out.
I make a luxury watch for 500$, you make your watch for 20$. We both sell our watches for double the price. I need to sell less watches to make a larger profit than you.
It seems like you’re trying to lie about Tesla to hate them.
I still hate Tesla and Elon despite the fact that the flop of the cyber truck isn’t actually worse than the worst flop of all time. That actually makes me more of a Tesla hater than you. Sorry, I don’t make the rules :/ better luck next time
Based on the fact that I know they cost more. They are marketed as luxury trucks my dude. It’s not some wild and wacky theory my guy. I just said 10x to make the math as simple as possible when I typed.
Edsels sold for the equivalent of 26,000$, cyber trucks start at 79,000$ that’s 1.5:1 in favor of cyber trucks.
I agree. The largest point to be highlighted is that learning and building skills is just as beautiful and natural as singing and dancing is portrayed in this post and intertwines with all of these activities.
But I mean it’s clear to me that this post is probably teenagers trying to intellectualize why they want to be lazy.
I hate Tesla as much as the next person but if the cyber truck retails at 10x the price (adjusting for inflation) then the cyber truck out earned the Ford Edsel 5:1. I don’t know the real numbers but I’m sure it’s not as bad as this makes it seem.
It’s like a kit car. It comes with the chassis and engine all intact, technically street-legal. You just get to decide whether you want windshields and doors, which some people consider pretty obvious and too much of a hassle to pretend they’re “optional”
I took it as a bastardization of the “return to nature” sort of movement. It’s in quotes because a type of naturalism can be very positive getting in touch with nature, conservationism etc. But the fascist version is worshipping colonialist sort of “homesteading” aesthetics and the patriarchal rugged explorer type that encourages hyper individualism and anti-social behavior.
Sadly, this whole conversation has been derailed by the deflection of the focus to small businesses probably with <10 people. Lots of these arguments made by the person you responded to become more and more threadbare as a company grows.
It makes more sense when the isekai is the character getting transported away and immediately placed in mortal danger over and over like Wizard of Oz. Dorothy has a choice of a provincial life where she might grow up and a world where flying monkeys attack her every chance they get and she’s never not on the run the entire story.
If I were isekai’d I would probably be extremely curious about whether I had a connection to my old world. But I wouldn’t necessarily leap to go the first chance I got.
I think they mean the targets were guilty but the post office workers and secretaries that got bombed were still innocent.











If you keep watching you’ll learn that the show is well aware of that and doesn’t shy away from leaning into the fantasy of it!