• 201dberg@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 hours ago

    They aren’t asking because they don’t expect him to agree to a ceasefire in the first place. They will offer a shit deal and then, when it’s rejected, because they know it’ll be rejected, they will cry about how Russia never really wanted peace and all their talk of diplomatic solutions previously were bullshit. This will justify more spending and antagonization.

    Liberals will gobble up just like the did for the entirety of the Cold War.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s a very plausible scenario. That said, it does look like the US is going to bail on the whole project to pursue new adventures in Asia now.

      • OrnluWolfjarl@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        There’s 2 possibilities, either Trump bails out and lets the EU and UK handle Ukraine, or Trump doubles down and keeps funding Ukraine. From the increasingly desperate attempts to escalate further (ATACMS strike in Russia outside of Kursk, blowing up merchant ships, attempts to shoot down civilian aircraft, assassinations of generals), I’d say the first possibility is the most likely.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I think so as well, everything I’ve seen from both Trump and Vance indicates that they understand the war isn’t in US interest, and they want to wind it down. Also worth noting that US pulling out would cause panic in Europe that would be monetized by the US military industry. There would be contracts for decades to come as a result.

  • redline@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    I was talking to someone recently, who was like “yeah we’ll have a ceasefire, raise NATO spending to 3% and rearm ukraine in the meantime.” I was fucking incredulous to hear this in real life…

    Do you really think the Russians would accept a ceasefire that allows for that under the circumstances? AFTER MINSK???

    Quite apart from the fact that if you are arguing (or more likely pretending to argue) from the ukrainian interest, it is completely incoherent. Such a strategy spells doom for ukraine

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I’ve seen this attitude as well, and it seems to be the thinking that most western leaders have now adapted. And it’s just so surreal to not even consider things from the Russian perspective here. The west got so used to dictating terms to the rest of the world, that it’s now inconceivable for people here that a country cannot be dictated to.

    • 201dberg@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 hours ago

      IMO, they don’t expect Putin to agree. I think they will go to the table knowing Putin will reject it, and then go to the media and be like “SEE, they never wanted a ceasefire. All of those times they claimed to try and have a diplomatic solution were just tricks and lies. Now we come with a real offer and they reject it.” And libs will gobble it up like they did… Every other time the US did this same kind of shit during the Cold war.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      Exactly, there is zero benefit for Russia to agree to one given that they’re winning and all this would accomplish would be to give Ukraine time to consolidate and resupply. I think Putin even said as much when he was doing his Q&A recently.