Summary

France’s Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor, its most powerful at 1,600 MW, was connected to the grid on December 21 after 17 years of construction plagued by delays and budget overruns.

The European Pressurized Reactor (EPR), designed to boost nuclear energy post-Chernobyl, is 12 years behind schedule and cost €13.2 billion, quadruple initial estimates.

President Macron hailed the launch as a key step for low-carbon energy and energy security.

Nuclear power, which supplies 60% of France’s electricity, is central to Macron’s plan for a “nuclear renaissance.”

  • etuomaala@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    The U-235 fuel cycle produces way more plutionium than the U-238 cycle, though.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I know just about noting about nuclear fuel cycles, but yes, more plutonium sounds exactly like what the French want. They have an arsenal to feed.

      • gaael@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        The military nuclear is the main reason behind our civilian nuclear infrastructure, which was planned during the cold war. It looks like once per century the military can have an unintended positive effect, yay.

          • gaael@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Don’t get me wrong, I’m in no way advocating for military nuclear (or even for anything military).

      • raoul@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        France stopped production of military fuel 30 years ago.

        The current goal is about recycling the existing nuclear waste, to reduce the need for long term storage and natural uranium.