• SankaraStone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Look, if Lemmy, NPR, and PBS can happen, then it’s always possible to fork Firefox (or throw more weight behind the Servo folk who are moving towards developing the Rust web engine towards embedded applications to get it up to speed faster for general web browsing) if Mitchell Baker and search revenue approach to funding Firefox is getting in the way of having a fast, private, and secure browser for everybody.

      But enough woah is me and our obstacles are overwhelming on here. In this case, if we do nothing, we get nothing. Especially if you’re right that the Mitchell Bakers of the world are not behind us. I know we at least have an ally in the EFF.

        • SankaraStone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Servo Folk. It’s one of the actions by Mitchell Baker that I disapproved of. Remember that the Rust programming language came out of Mozilla, right? It was being designed to create a fast and secure web engine by a related team. This Web Engine was of course Servo, written in Rust. Mozilla than took parts of their work and incorporated it into the Gecko web engine that runs Firefox, which was the Quantum Update. That’s where you saw the major speed up in Firefox to catch up to and beat Blink in many cases. Mitchell Baker a couple of years later made a move to lay off the Rust and Servo folk and spin out those projects so that they wouldn’t be Mozilla’s problem anymore, discontinuing their funding. She then proceeded to give herself a huge raise all while Mozilla’s market share had fallen to ~3%. It ticked me off needless to say.

          Have you heard of Electron? It’s the use of Chromium’s Blink web engine to run web apps as individual programs. Applications like Signal, Ferdi, Atom text editor, VS Code (the most popular IDE for developers) all use electron. I asked myself for years why isn’t there a Gecko equivalent of Electron? The answer is that Gecko’s way too old and janky (cobbled together over decades since the Netscape Navigator days), making it too difficult to work with. But the Servo project, being a completely fresh web engine written in Rust, is looking to play that role as its immediate functional goal. It’s a smaller, more attainable goal before it becomes a full fledged web engine that competes with the likes of Gecko, Blink, and Webkit (Safari and also what Blink’s based off of) to run a full fledged browser. The Servo project was out in the wilderness for a while before coming back to life in 2023.

          https://servo.org/

          • nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh wow. Thanks for that explanation. It only has made me angrier at Mozilla. They have completely lost their way and forgotten their original mission.

            I wonder why Mozilla didn’t want their own rendering engine to compete with Blink…

            • SankaraStone@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I mean they already have one, Gecko. And since they also made Servo, they took a lot of the good parts and incorporated it into Gecko, which led to the speed up (they parallelized a lot of the processes and started using people’s GPUs more).

              And they have made Mozilla VPN and had it integrate with this this multi-account container add-on (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/multi-account-containers/) that lets you sandbox your internet browsing (like you can set up a google account container, a Facebook/Instagram container, a banking/finance container). So those have been privacy pluses in the years since Baker canned the Rust and Servo teams, blaming Covid-19 all while giving herself a raise. And Firefox seems to be competitive with Chrome in terms of speed of web rendering and whatnot: https://www.androidauthority.com/firefox-vs-chrome-which-web-browser-reigns-supreme-3294340/

              And there’s just some simple things in Firefox by default, like clicking on a simple button to disable most of the javascript that’s janking everything up on a website and making it simple and readable, that just make it so much better than Chrome.

              • nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                From what you’ve said though there seem to be benefits from cleaning up Gecko in order to make it feasible to turn it into something similar to Electron.

    • d-RLY?
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wouldn’t need to take their money if donations were to get high enough (though it might be easier to have a collective org that all kinds of open internet groups could join and donate to). At the moment FF is the only browser that isn’t relying on Google’s Chromium while also being a real player that isn’t OS specific like Safari is. All the FF alts may have their own very good points for making their forks, but they aren’t building anything from the ground up. Which puts them in the same spot as all the Chromium based forks with regards to relying on base code needing to stay current. It is of course possible for the Chromium forks to join with FF (and any of its forks that can put their issues with Mozilla aside on this issue) to call for protections.

      IE/Microsoft was pulling the same kinds of shit before Chrome, Firefox, and Safari were able to show what could be possible with both actual demands for standards to be followed and that the internet should be open. The open standards are what allowed so many devs of all classes/nationalities/ages/etc to create so many cool things when barriers like money and copyright are removed. Now Google is the Microsoft of the internet and they only respect the rights of corps and rich fucks that don’t create anything. Just digital rights versions of landlords. We wouldn’t have the options we have now if we waited for those copyrights holders to stop us from just doing shit with technology.

      • nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        The sad part is that you can’t donate to Firefox directly. Only to the Mozilla Foundation, which, I think misguidedly, is trying to become a political advocacy entity. They want to talk about “hate speech” online. They want to make their own AI thing… ugh. I would never deny that society and the internet has big problems. But it seems the organization has been overtaken by people who want to play political games rather than just making free software.

        If they focused solely on making a killer browser they might actually be able to dethrown Chromium or at least become more than a niche player.

      • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wouldn’t need to take their money if donations were to get high enough

        You can’t even donate to Firefox directly. Donation money goes to the corp., which means it goes to CEO pay raises.

        • d-RLY?
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Isn’t that what Google does when they pay for being the default? Real and honest question because I would imagine that the money from them would just as easily be used the same way you say donating to the Mozilla Foundation would be used. No money going to the foundation would also mean that the only way to fund the projects would be completely on relying on Google. Or at least that is how I understand it, and I am more than ready to be wrong. And if donating to the foundation means nothing. Then what about paying for the optional stuff like the VPN/Relay? Even if it goes to the foundation, it (at least per what they state and ideally does) claim to use funding to push into the politics of internet related projects. Which is also important for being able to fight legal battles like anti-trust (again ideally since I am not defaultly saying funds can’t and/or aren’t used incorrectly).

          • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            No money going to the foundation would also mean that the only way to fund the projects would be completely on relying on Google.

            No. You could just directly donate to the developers (not to Firefox, there’s a difference). Though that requires the developers to take the firsts step: any web developer worth their salt knows how effed up the system is with donations going to corps, and will open up their own tip jar / donations box in a system like, dunno, Paypal or ko-fi.

    • SankaraStone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      P.S. I thought I made my reply to your commment in another thread that I made instead of both yours and my comment being in this one. The post you were replying to inspired me to look up how to file an antitrust complaint with the US government.

      Here’s what I was referring to:

      https://lemmy.world/post/2060683