I’ll probably stick to asking for oat milk instead of “porridge water” or whatever the new mandated name will be. To be honest I do think calling it “milk” lets them inflate the price when it is essentially porridge water.

  • Rogue@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Dairy UK had argued that it was unlawful to use “milk” in a trademark relating to “products that are not mammary secretions”.

    I think consumers need to argue that all milk should be accurately labelled as “mammary secretions”

  • OrlandoDoom@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 days ago

    RIP coconut milk.

    Funny that before oats and soy started gaining in popularity they had no problems with coconut milk.

    • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yeah. And it is clear the court is not being unbiased. Given your comment.

      It seems likely that parliment could be convinced to rule on this with enough negativity. No legal restrictions exist on the name. The dairy industry has no trademark or claim of unique use or confusion.

      Parliment has the right to rule against this by act. if they agree. IE basically passing a law restricting courts from bias against long used language terminology.

      Honestly it would require folks to write to MPs pointing out the stupidity ans bias. But enough may be annoyed by this that such a movement can be formed.

  • Richard🔶UK@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    I looked into the high price of plant milks. It’s essentially because the industry is new and still investing in R&D and new factories. The dairy industry has very little innovation now, just court cases.

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      Don’t forget the dairy industry takes lots of health subsidies in many countries too.

  • houseofleft@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I find this whole “it’s not milk if it’s not dairy” argument really hard to take in good faith.

    I’m not an expert at all, but when I’ve heard people talk about these kind of decisions, it sounds like it’s normally meant to come down to consumer benefits.

    Who’s gaining here (aside from dairy lobbies)? I don’t think there’s any reasonable argument that UK citizens are confused by the term “oat milk”, and buying it because they were tricked into thinking it was a dairy product.

    • disgrunty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      7 days ago

      I know a person who thought that the “plant milks” are flavours of regular milk until it was explained to them. Like chocolate milk.

      All people are at least a little stupid. We’re all stupid in our own way. Something that seems obvious to you and I may seem mind-boggling to someone else.

      • steeznson@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        Would have been hilarious if big dairy brought them into the trial as an “expert witness”.

        “Yes, that’s right ladies and gentlemen, I am a real life strawman.”

      • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Yeah there are idiots, but what’s the harm? They may be shocked to find there’s 0 dairy, but how does that impact them? The nutrition info is on the label, as is the ingredients.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        Tbf especially with “almond milk” I could 100% see that. Honestly it’s more logical than “they squeeze all the juice out of the almonds” (I have no idea the process for making almond milk lmao ykwim), someone seeing it and saying “Almonds huh? Crazy, what flavor will they think of next? I’d have chosen hazelnut” is really not that big of a jump.

        Honestly I’m more surprised I didn’t think that, but iirc I was informed about it through a vegan friend before I even saw it in the store.

      • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Law has a concept of the average idiot (cannot remember the real term). When applying confusion as a risk. Honestly milk has been used so much in English. (Coconutsand other things) I think that would fail.

        I ANAL though.

        Its more likely that oat milk is intentionally selling as a mamory milk alternative. That was made as an argument. But it is clearly a biased response from the court.

  • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    And what about the word “milking”? Is it legal to use when you are not talking about mammaries?

  • GoodShowSir@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    I love me some porridge water. Especially a porridge water latte.

    You know what, I have zero problem calling it that, own it oatly! :D

    • Richard🔶UK@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Porridge is different. It’s been cooked which crosslinks the starch molecules. Oat milk isn’t porridge water… it’s different down at the molecular level. Believe me, I made this mistake when ‘cooking’ up a batch, sorry, that should have been ‘cocking’

    • Richard🔶UK@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Minor Figures oat milk is my favourite. Try some different brands. You’ve been given a bad one… was it cheap?

      • fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Actually, now I think about it, that only covers one section of the market.

        You should also release exactly the same product with with different packaging a few times:

        • One with an off-brand Mr T character mascot, called “I Pity The Gruel”.

        • One called “Bilk : Better than Milk”.

        That’s a few shelves of supermarkets covered with selling the same thing. I’m sure you can cover some more with a few like “Barista Supreme: Oat-based Cream”, “Oat Water”, “Oat Juice” and simply “Oat-based Drink”. Maybe even “Oat Blood”, for Goths and “My dad was a gruelmaker” for Keir Starmer fans.