The District of Columbia sued Amazon on Wednesday, alleging the company secretly stopped providing its fastest delivery service to residents of two predominantly Black neighborhoods while still charging millions of dollars for a membership that promises the benefit.

The complaint filed in District of Columbia Superior Court revolves around Amazon’s Prime membership, which costs consumers $139 per year or $14.99 per month for fast deliveries — including one-day, two-day and same-day shipments — along with other enhancements.

In mid-2022, the lawsuit alleges, the Seattle-based online retailer imposed what it called a delivery “exclusion” on two low-income ZIP codes in the district — 20019 and 20020 — and began relying exclusively on third-party delivery services such as UPS and the U.S. Postal Service, rather than its own delivery systems.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    You’re right, I didn’t read this time. I usually do, but this time I am guilty.

    Also, just risking other drivers instead of your own is supremely shitty of them.

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          How is that your take away? It’s either an undeliverable address because the customer or a dog has threatened a postal worker, or they are going there at least 5 times a week anyway.

          Are you saying some people or communities just don’t deserve mail?

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            I’m saying just saying “let the post office deal with it” is the same as saying g “it’s ok if postal carriers get attacked or even murdered.”

            Or do you have a solution to that which the USPS can do but Amazon can’t?

            • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              Amazon can, it’s just too expensive for them to want to do it. This is the reason the postal service exists, if it became privatized half of us would stop getting mail delivery, at least at any kind of reasonable price.

              Sounds like you just don’t want people you deem undesirable to receive services.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                No, I don’t want people to be murdered. Apparently you’re okay with it as long as it’s a post office employee and not an Amazon employee.

                • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 days ago

                  So you honestly think entire American zip codes are just murder zones? Where do you think the USPS employees working these zip codes live?

                  You insult your fellow humans with this nonsense. USPS wants nothing to do with your hateful rhetoric.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    5 days ago

                    Why is Amazon not delivering to that area? Because I thought it was that their drivers were at risk. Why are postal workers expendable but Amazon workers aren’t? Is this some anti-union thing that you are taking way, way too far?

    • capital@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      And if they ignored the problem you’d be criticizing Amazon for failing to care for their employees (contractors).

      A private company isn’t well positioned to actually solve the root issue here. All they can do is remove their employees (contractors) from danger.

      Amazon’s shitty for other reasons. But I don’t think this is one of them.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        And if they ignored the problem you’d be criticizing Amazon for failing to care for their employees (contractors).

        You’re right. Because failing to take care of their employees and putting other people’s employees at risk in order to stop their employees from getting attacked are both reprehensible.

        Do USPS employees deserve to be attacked but Amazon employees don’t?

        If Dominos drivers kept getting attacked so Dominos just contracted out to Doordash to let them get attacked instead, I would hope you would think that neither situation was acceptable.