Summary

Gen Z is increasingly relying on “buy now, pay later” (BNPL) services for holiday shopping, with spending projected to rise 11.4% this year, totaling $18.5 billion.

These services appeal to younger consumers with limited credit histories but can lead to overextension, as they lack centralized reporting and encourage overspending.

Experts warn of accumulating fees, particularly when BNPL plans are tied to credit cards.

With inflation and rising credit card debt already burdening Gen Z, consumer advocates caution that these services may worsen financial instability despite their convenience.

  • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Every single Millennial also had those predatory debit card overdraft fees.

    Banks would allow them to purchase something even if the checking account had no money and then hits them with like 25$ for every overdraft. Practice only outlawed in 2010.

    God It was this feeling of helpless anger when banks would screw you while u are down. Thanks Obama for fixing that.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Oh it was far worse than that…

      They would actually change the order of your transactions in order to maximize the number of overdrafts (and each cost $30+).

      For example, say you’ve got $80 in your account. You buy three separate meals over the course of Monday and Tuesday, and you’ve got $50 left in your account. But now you remember that there is that one thing they NEEDS to be paid for, but it’s $75 and you only have $50 on your account.

      Well, you have no choice but to make the payment that brings you to -$25, and incur the single overdraft fee. Sucks, but $30 penalty is less than not having Internet for a month or whatever, so you do it.

      So to recap: You had $50 left after those 3 meals. You made one single transaction that brought your account into negative, that means one overdraft fee, right?

      Nope.

      They would literally re-order the transactions, put the largest one first ($75), bringing your balance down to $5, THEN they would process the meals from Monday and Tuesday giving you THREE separate overdraft fees of $30 each.

      So now you owe the bank $90 on top of the $25. And that was what the banks sold as, “overdraft protection.”

      Shit was disgustingly egregious. Obama made it illegal I believe.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I wish this “overdraft protection” was opt in so people at least have a chance to understand it. I turn mine off, deny my card who gives a shit

        • FarFarAway@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          They wouldn’t let me turn mine off. The first bank flat out said no, the credit union charged me $5 to draft $100 from my savings. If there wasnt $100 in the savings, they would charge me the $5 to take what was in my savings and the $25 overdraft to cover the rest. There were no other options.

        • prole@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Right, that’s how they fooled people for years. Any normal person would think “overdraft protection” means, “deny the transaction so you don’t overdraft.” But nope, complete opposite.

          It was so scummy.