(FYI - the article that the guy is replying to is misinformation. Two commenters have provided snopes links for anyone curious.)

  • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Well I was trying to be simplistic but since you typed so much, the reason your message isnt received well is because you assume Ill intent by the OP, while the one getting up votes makes no assumptions about intent.

    Technically theirs is more accurate because they are acknowledging they can’t know the original intent, while you are arguing that its obvious what their intent is.

    • OBJECTION!
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I said literally nothing about their intent in my comment whatsoever.