• darthelmet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It certainly wasn’t as extreme or successful as the soviet union, but there was a lot of unionization going on during the industrial revolution that was more radical than the tamer bargaining unions we see in the post-war era. And then the depression happened and things got really bad. It’s not hard to see how elites would have looked out at what was happening in the world, looked at the bad economic situation at home, and concluded that something had to be done.

    FDR even said that they were trying to reform capitalism to save it.

    https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Wikiquote:Transwiki/American_history_quotes_New_Deal

    1933 “It was this administration which saved the system of private profit and free enterprise after it had been dragged to the brink of ruin.” President Roosevelt, on how his emergency actions in 1933 prevented a revolution and saved capitalism.

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It certainly wasn’t as extreme or successful as the soviet union,

      So we agree that there was no way there was going to be a Socialist uprising in America in the 1930s, which is what you were trying to imply.

      Also, the idea that FDR’s plans weren’t radical is ludacris. The only evidence you can come up with is a cloying speech he gave to settle the nerves of people who feared an actual revolution.