• m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    At least it’s a dismissal without prejudice which leaves the door open for charges to be brought back once Trump is no longer in office and as long as the statute of limitation hasn’t run out.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You know how the courts love putting rich old white dudes behind bars, right?

      Assuming of course we don’t end up with a Republican dictatorship after this presidency, then it’s all meaningless anyway.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 hours ago

      leaves the door open for charges to be brought back once Trump is no longer in office

      Assuming his lard-ass lives that long.

        • 4am@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Get ready to find out that all laws are just made up and no one gives a shit if the other people with power let him do whatever he wants

    • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I can’t say I’m feeling overly optimistic about anything worthwhile happening with this case after 9 years, when they failed to move forward in nearly 5

      • Ech@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        How is “less than 4” now “nearly 5”?

    • undercrust@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 hours ago

      A glimmer of hope, but at least, of the extremely limited options, this one leaves a shred of hope behind.

      Still fucking awful and a complete condemnation of the justice system in the US, but POC in the States have known that for years, now it’s just whitey getting shown how fucking biased it is to privilege and wealth.

    • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Who’s going to revive a 10 year old political case against an 83 year old that’s retiring from politics? In the US?

        • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Again, who is going to stop him? The presidential pardon is wide reaching, and no one has ever tried to pardon themselves before so there’s no legal precedent. You think this supreme court is gonna stop him?

          Also, he absolutely can pardon for something that was dismissed. Nixon got pardoned for something he was never even charged with.

        • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          He could. The president can pardon any federal crimes that’s already committed except in cases of impeachment. Gerald Ford pardoned Nixon even tho he was never charged with crimes. Now the constitution never explicitely said they can pardom themselves, but maybe the supreme court would let him.