Is that New Zealand at the left side of Australia?
It tends to wander
The location of New Zealand is in a superposition that collapses, when observed (i.e. drawn on a map). The crux is that the superposition doesn’t just encompasses earth
No that’s Newer Zealand
At least they are on the map this time!
Me posting from a country with wild capybaras:
Me posting from a country with an extremely large stretched and slightly transparent capybara:
I used to live a 10mins walk from wild capybaras, good times
How do you even get the data that says if a country has a specific animal in a zoo?
You look at a map.
I mean, you can probably just color in whatever. It’s not like anyone’s gonna check.
They put their source in the bottom middle of the image
Damn, what’d Chile do to piss off the Cappies?
I like the random stretched capybara in Russia
A capybara seems like one of those animals that really wouldn’t care about living in a zoo
Ah yes,my favorite country south america excluding chile :>
Little know fact about Chile, the closest country to Chile is New Zealand.
Ah yes, the famed Siberian Loooooooooong Capybara
People think the Russian steppes are inhabited because of the harsh climate and long distances from everywhere. But new satellite images show the Giant Capybara that dominate the area and destroy any try of human settlement.
There are wild capybaras in Florida
https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/a029f491389241fd87ab7396862447e8
Hmmm, 330-miles to see wild capybaras? Or, cruise over to Louisiana and roll with the nutrias?
Costa Rica has wild capybaras. I’ve seen them.
Considering the first time I ever saw one in real life, I was camping and there was a wild family and the campers next to us warned me not to get close to them, I can confirm that they exist in at least a part of the US not in a zoo.
You’ll never find a Nessie in the zoo.
But what do I do If I can’t afford to move to a country without them? I know the risk of meeting one in green is rare but the outcome is simply to harsh to ignore them.
I can’t get over “doesn’t” instead of hasn’t
doesn’t have
Would you say “it hasn’t capybaras” or “it doesn’t have capybaras”?
I would say capybaren’t, but I know this is serious business
The capybara tried its best, ok?
I don’t time for this.
