• M600@lemmy.world
      168·
      2 days ago

      Dude, I am all for people trying and stuff.

      I can tell that you are just starting out in the graph game, and that is cool and all. But compare to OP yours looks terrible. I’m not trying to be mean, I’m just trying to save you from the embarrassment.

      Take another look at OPs graph and pay attendtion to the different thickness in the lines and the unpredictable curves.

    • Vivendi@lemmy.zip
      154·
      2 days ago

      8 was INCREDIBLY fast

      It also used little resources and it was the last time Microsoft pulled a massive dev effort to modernize almost everything in Windows, significantly evolving it’s display and rendering pipeline and making a whole different design language

      8 touch interface was also by far the best touch interface I’ve used

          • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
            1·
            2 days ago

            It was an improvement but still not great. Ideally they would have kept the Windows 7 interface with maybe some upgrades like virtual desktops, then continued with all the under the hood improvements.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      7·
      3 days ago

      8 had a real small install footprint if I recall. It worked on a lot of really shitty hardware that 10 didn’t. 8 is definitely not as popular as 10

  • Fosheze@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1983·
    3 days ago

    Win 10 was definitely an improvement over 8. I’d even argue that 10 as it started out was the best since xp. Of course now 10 has been fully enshitified but it used to be good.

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      364·
      3 days ago

      I would agree that 10 was very good, but i could say similar things about windows 11 which in many ways performs better then 10.

      And yet its shortly after upgrading to 11 that i switched to linux to never look back.

      I think part of the logic in this meme is that it doesn’t matter how good the basic functions of the operating system are but what does is the design philosophy of the company. Loyalty in other systems decreased while Loyalty in windows gained.

      Microsoft force feeding edge, onedrive, burrying the local account option till after the install with Microsoft account.

      Randomly finding an update put a second weather widget on my taskbar that shows a different weather then the one in start. Taskbar icons that cant be closed, only hidden.

      These things don’t affect the OS functionality in a big deal but its like i was in an abusive relationship that i finally got out of. No matter how much sweet talking and promises to do better i am not going back.

    • RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      131·
      3 days ago

      I’d even argue that 10 as it started out was the best since xp

      How can you so batantly skip over Win 7? I’ve heard some argue 10 was better (it wasn’t) but that 7 >> XP was pretty undisputed.

      All three are shit compared to Linux, of course (Arch btw).

    • psvrh@lemmy.ca
      71·
      3 days ago

      8 wasn’t nearly as bad as people think, and there were big improvements to the kernel that make it a definite improvement over 7.

      The problem for most people was the Start screen, which if you could get past, left you with what was a really good OS.

      Less ads and telemetry than 10, too.

      • Ziglin@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        24 hours ago

        It also had a lot of weird issues that people asked me or mostly techy people around me to fix. People with Windows 7 or 10 had significantly less issues and because of the familiarity (which obviously isn’t necessarily a good thing) more people could fix the problem due to having had it themselves.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      3·
      3 days ago

      I actually loved 8, but only after they allowed the desktop experience to emulate what people were more used to. It was super innovative, though, for the time.

  • Korne127@lemmy.world
    44·
    2 days ago

    Saying Windows 10 is worse than Windows 8 is just nonsense. Saying macOS is worse now than 5 years ago is… just dumb? And the colour scheme doesn’t make any sense, why is the red at macOS literally higher than the green?

    • hardcoreufo@lemmy.world
      2·
      2 days ago

      OSX peaked in the 2000s and early 2010s. Apple started walling it off more and more a decade ago.

      Their hardware has gotten better in the past 5 years with the m series chips and getting rid of that terrible keyboard though.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zipEnglish
      4·
      2 days ago

      For the Mac and Linux graphs the color seems to represent the rate. When it’s going up it’s green and when it’s going down it’s red.

    • WormFood@lemmy.world
      2·
      2 days ago

      the timeline in the pic is a bit off, but macos is definitely getting worse. I think mavericks was the last version that let you turn off mouse acceleration.

      • KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world
        5·
        2 days ago

        On Sonoma and higher:

        System Settings > Mouse > Advanced

        On every version:

        defaults write .GlobalPreferences com.apple.mouse.scaling -1
    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      1·
      2 days ago

      Nah. Snow Leopard was peak UI and Mojave was the last tolerable version. I really need to make it a winter project to customize my desktop to have some of the UI elements that got lost in Mac.

  • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    623·
    3 days ago

    Windows 10 on the same level as ME and Vista?.. And worse than 8 with that fucking Metro UI?

    Ok. Ok…oh…kay.

    Look I like Linux and want to eventually abandon windows for it, but this is just mindless circle jerking here

    • SloganLessons@lemmy.worldEnglish
      29·
      3 days ago

      This meme says:

      • windows 8 somehow is more beloved than Windows 10 (lmao)
      • linux is just one single OS, instead of an agglomerate of hundreds of distributions
      • and implies that every single one of them got better with time (lmao)
  • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    892·
    3 days ago

    The only thing I disagree with here is Win8 being apparently better than Win10.

    Win8 was really damn annoying to use without a touchscreen, and while Win8.1 did help, Win10 was by far the better implementation of PC Metro IMO.

    Having said that, Win11 is exactly where it needs to be. It’s all of Win10’s worst traits cranked up to 11 with a heaping of it’s own bullshit and spyware on top

    • RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      104·
      3 days ago

      Win8 was really damn annoying to use without a touchscreen

      So many people say that but I actually liked the menu. It opened very fast and you could far more quickly find and hit the right tile than that stupid nested programs tree that was the norm in the start menus of earlier Windows versions.

      I’d say considering that telemetry started to creep in primarily with Win 10, 8 was indeed better (meaning less bad).

      • CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.worldEnglish
        111·
        3 days ago

        Personally, I felt like Win8 was an over correction in favor of touch screens vs Win7. Win8.1 was kind of the sweet spot for getting touch screen functionality into Windows while maintaining a consistent UI between tablets, laptops, and desktops. So much so that I would consider it to be separate point on the chart between 8 and 10.

        Win10 did improve the UI a bit over that, but was so much of a step backwards in basically every other regard that I do consider that the point at which Windows started trending consistently downwards. As in, Win10 should be lower then Win7 on that curve, with Win11 lower than that, and no real hope that any future updates or versions will ever improve anything.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      25·
      3 days ago

      Yea, I’d say Win10/11 is on the same good/shit cycle as always

      Though whether Win12 breaks it and continues the shitty trend is highly likely at this point

    • drathvedro@lemm.ee
      51·
      3 days ago

      Definitely, yes. Win8 was unusable on desktops but was pretty good on tablets, win10 sucks on both. But the main thing is that spyware/bloatware explosion happened in win10. Xbox services, onedrive, cortana, that weather thing with msn news, fucking candy crush preinstalls, etc, all came with win10.

    • bruhduh@lemmy.world
      1111·
      3 days ago

      Try to install windows 10 on hdd and see for yourself, Linux works fine no matter which device it’s loaded from, windows before 10 did too

      • Hupf@feddit.org
        101·
        3 days ago

        Windows philosophy is that it comes pre-installed and should be used with recent hardware. You may think of that what you will (environment wise etc), but to me that’s a valid design choice to make, in principle.

          • thawed_caveman@lemmy.world
            4·
            2 days ago

            No, but what are you going to do? Install WIn10 on a computer that’s too old and doesn’t meet the minimum specs?

            If you have a 2010 computer, it’s either old Windows or Linux, modern WIndows is going to suck, if it even works. Ergo, i can’t think of a circumstance where you’d want/have to install Win10 on a hard drive instead of an SSD.

            Maybe shits and giggles, similar to running Doom on random stuff? If someone has more imagination than me then i’m open

            • bruhduh@lemmy.world
              6·
              3 days ago

              Modern linux mint with zram works flawlessly on lga775 4gb ram and Nvidia gt210 and hdd as main and only drive

    • Blackout@fedia.io
      119·
      3 days ago

      The software I run a 8 figure business with only works in windows and macs. Not a specific title but the software for an entire industry. Linux is nice but still a novelty in my world.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        71·
        3 days ago

        What software is that? Is it something with a really heavy desktop client by nature (e.g CAD, video editing), or could it instead have a browser-based frontend?

        • Blackout@fedia.io
          11·
          3 days ago

          Yes, CAD/CAM stuff like Catia, SW, mastercam, etc. It will take a lot of market share improvements to convince the developers to bother with a port. I’m no M$ fanboy, just no real production alternative.

          • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
            5·
            3 days ago

            So much grief caused by the widespread move from Unix to Windows in the industry sector. The Unix dwarves grew too greedy, their hardware platforms too niche… they unleashed the beast from the depths. An IBM-PC so powerful, it quashed their empires!

          • boonhet@lemm.ee
            3·
            3 days ago

            I reckon they might be using a lot of Windows specific libraries, making any porting a real pain in the ass. And when you’re in that space, unfortunately people just have to choose the OS that goes with their applications, not the other way around.

            It’s literally easier to start an entirely new CAD/CAM project and make that cross-platform. Unfortunately, that’s a 7 or 8 figure proposition to get started as well (probably 8 for a polished product that can pull proper market share).

      • teslasaur@lemmy.world
        21·
        3 days ago

        Same. Until Linux is supported by scada systems it will only be a service, non-hmi OS, in my world.

        • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
          1·
          3 days ago

          The sad part is a lot of modern SCADAs and DCSs are migrating or have already migrated to HTML, but using Microsoft technologies as core. 🤦‍♂️

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    14·
    2 days ago

    I would put win8 lower and win10 as a slight rise but not up to win 7 territory and then plummet. osx should plummet with the iosification of it.

  • Avatar_of_Self@lemmy.worldEnglish
    2·
    2 days ago

    People forget XP was pretty bad at first just like Windows 98 and like Windows 98 people became less critical after a bunch of major fixes. For Windows 98 this became Windows 98SE and for XP this became XP SP2 (and eventually 3).

    Both Vista and 7 had problems before they were fixed after awhile. The most common issue I can remember was UAC and everyone just told you to turn it off to install and use their software and games. There were also a bunch of breaking Win API stuff and a lot of software made for XP just didn’t work anymore in Vista+.

    People mainly just remember them after they were fixed, except for Vista because 7 came out fairly quickly (just 2 years later). Microsoft does not have a good track record for initial Windows releases but eventually everyone forgets and even some of the bad ones are remembered as the good ones.

  • youngalfred@lemm.ee
    424·
    3 days ago

    Vista wasn’t that bad. The dodgy selling it on computers that couldn’t handle it was an issue (much like they still do with selling laptops with only 32gb storage).

    I still think it was one of the nicest looking - black taskbar with the start button sticking up, sidebar widgets, aero glass etc

    • GiveOver@feddit.uk
      24·
      3 days ago

      It was never stable for me. I remember I had a laptop that would always refuse to shut down because “shutdown.exe” was running

    • psvrh@lemmy.ca
      71·
      3 days ago

      You’re absolutely right about this. 7 is basically a Vista service pack that got rebranded.

      All of the “good stuff” people credit 7 with came in Vista.

    • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
      6·
      3 days ago

      I remember the hardware situation being very fucked, due to driver authors not updating their shit in time and people trying to get their older stuff working which worked fine under XP, but was incompatible with Vista’s new driver model. It took a couple years until the release of 7 for most of those issues to get ironed out.

    • AspieEgg@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      3·
      3 days ago

      I think some of the biggest complaints about Vista were its poor driver support and over-active UAC. You couldn’t hardly do anything on the computer without UAC bugging you for permission when Vista first came out.