• NatakuNox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    How can there be a negotiations if they keep killing the person on the other side of negotiations?!

    • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Why did they kill Haniyeh when he was the guy they were negotiating with as Hamas’s head diplomat? All while both sides were apparently “days away from an agreement”?

      • homura1650@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 hours ago

        You don’t make peace with your friends. You make peace with your enemies.

        Unless you actually plan on commiting a full scale and thorough genocide, eliminating terrorists is simply not a viable strategy for defeating terrorism. If you don’t go all the way to genocide, then a sizable portion of the non-terrorists you didn’t kill will become terrorist

        • maplebar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          You act as if people in Hamas and Hezbollah have no agency in the matter.

          Becoming a terrorist isn’t some predetermined act of destiny, it’s a deliberate life choice–the cost of which is having your dick blown off by an exploding pager.

      • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter… All Zionest are terrorists too so if that’s the standard…

        • maplebar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Islamists or Zionists, I know which one I’d put my money on the next time there’s a random terrorist attack somewhere in the western world…

          The Palestinians were handed a nation on a silver platter after the fall of the Ottoman Empire, but they were too stupid and greedy for their own good and decided to wage an unsuccessful war of genocide against Israel in 1947, only to have the entire thing blow up in their face and cost them almost half of their territory. Sound familiar?

          • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Zionism is a Settler Colonialist Ideology that planned the ethnic cleansing of Palestine in 1947

            Partition

            The Zionist position changed in 1928, when the pragmatic Palestinian leaders agreed to the principle of parity in a rare moment in which clannish and religious differences were overcome for the sake of consensus. The Palestinian leaders feared that without parity the Zionists would gain control of the political system. The unexpected Palestinian agreement threw the Zionist leaders into temporary confusion. When they recovered, they sent a refusal to the British, but at the same time offered an alternative solution: the partitioning of Palestine into two political units.

            • Pg 132 of Ilan Pappe - A History of Modern Palestine

            On 31 August 1947, UNSCOP presented its recommendations to the UN General Assembly. Three of its members were allowed to put forward an alternative recommendation. The majority report advocated the partition of Palestine into two states, with an economic union. The designated Jewish state was to have most of the coastal area, western Galilee, and the Negev, and the rest was to become the Palestinian state. The minority report proposed a unitary state in Palestine based on the principle of democracy. It took considerable American Jewish lobbying and American diplomatic pressure, as well as a powerful speech by the Russian ambassador to the UN, to gain the necessary two-thirds majority in the Assembly for partition. Even though hardly any Palestinian or Arab diplomat made an effort to promote the alternative scheme, it won an equal number of supporters and detractors, showing that a considerable number of member states realized that imposing partition amounted to supporting one side and opposing the other.

            • Pg 181 of Ilan Pappe - A History of Modern Palestine
            Ethnic Cleansing and Settler Colonialism

            Israel justifies the settlements and military bases in the West Bank in the name of Security. However, the reality of the settlements on-the-ground has been the cause of violent resistance and a significant obstacle to peace, as it has been for decades.

            This type of settlement, where the native population gets ‘Transferred’ to make room for the settlers, is a long standing practice.

            The mass ethnic cleansing campaign of 1948:

            Further, declassified Israeli documents show that the Occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip were deliberately planned before being executed in 1967:

            While the peace process was exploited to continue de-facto annexation of the West Bank via Settlements

            The settlements are maintained through a violent apartheid that routinely employs violence towards Palestinians and denies human rights like water access, civil rights, etc. This kind of control gives rise to violent resistance to the Apartheid occupation, jeopardizing the safety of Israeli civilians.

            Apartheid Evidence

            Amnesty Report

            Human Rights Watch Report

            B’TSelem Report with quick Explainer

            Visualizing the Ethnic Cleansing

            Peace Process and Solution

            Both Hamas and Fatah have agreed to a Two-State solution based on the 1967 borders for decades. Oslo and Camp David were used by Israel to continue settlements in the West Bank and maintain an Apartheid, while preventing any actual Two-State solution

            How Avi Shlaim moved from two-state solution to one-state solution

            ‘One state is a game changer’: A conversation with Ilan Pappe

            One State Solution, Foreign Affairs

            Hamas proposed a full prisoner swap as early as Oct 8th, and agreed to the US proposed UN Permanent Ceasefire Resolution. Additionally, Hamas has already agreed to no longer govern the Gaza Strip, as long as Palestinians receive liberation and a unified government can take place.

            Historian Works on the History
          • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Uhhhhhh what does that have to do with a 7 year old starving to death in Gaza? Honestly you just showed your hand. Good bye bigot. I already have you blocked and screened