Conservation of mass?

Do they understand that producing energy and fertilizer using the bodies of animals is less efficient than producing the same number of calories or mass of nitrates from plants+less-energy-than-is-required-to-raise-the-animal-in-question?

  • roux [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    25 minutes ago

    If I remember later I can try to find a chart on this that I might have bookmarked. But the chart basically shows that the amount of calories a cow has to eat to product, say, 100g of meat is 11 times as much. It was a pretty big eye opener for me when I was first going over to veganism.

  • Hestia [comrade/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Using animals as fertilizer is a nessessity brought about by phasing out crop rotations. If we just rotated our fucking crops that would naturally replenish the soil. Instead we have endless fields of corn year after year

  • Frivolous_Beatnik [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    This was one of the first things we were taught in school during units on nutrient cycles - the closer to the source of energy, the sun, an organism is in the cycle, the more efficient their utilization of the energy is. I don’t know if I’m taking knowledge of this concept for granted but it’s so simple in my own mind.

  • Luna [she/her, null/void]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I don’t know if it’s all of them, but I know someone who said that veganism is actually more harmful for the planet because plants need pesticides and fertilizer, which kill bugs. It took no effort to challenge them on that at all.