• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      I would, he’s an extreme pacifist to the point where figuratively if he saw a grown man beating a six year old to death in an alley he wouldn’t lift a finger to stop it.

      He’d admonish it, tell them to stop, maybe even call them corncob.

      But he wouldn’t use violence to save that childs life.

      And obviously in this analogy Gaza is the child that can’t defend itself.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        He’s literally sending weapons to the man beating the child and telling him where to hit him where it hurts most

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          What about supplying weapons or even directly aiding a war effort negates pacifism?

          You’re talking about the most extreme as far as determination not commitment, absolutionist pacifists is what they’re called.

          They would have a problem with that.

          But treating every member of a group like they’re the same as the most extreme…

          I’m hesitant to ask but whatever groups do you apply that logic to? It’s rarely (if ever) a good idea.