• jmp242@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s so interesting to me is that from much of what I’ve read - bombing civilian populations as a way to end a war has basically never worked. It was pushed heavily in WWII due to I think LeMay theories, but basically strengthened morale to stand up to the enemy instead.

    Of course, not saying the Russians, or really anyone who gets into a war is necessarily behaving rationally, but this is sadly very destructive with very little history saying it’ll help anyone achieve any goal.

    • takeda@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, in case of Ukrainians they know that if they surrender it still won’t be over, the next thing will be killing them and moving them to far east until the Ukrainian identity is completely erased.

      • 133arc585
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, in case of Ukrainians they know that if they surrender it still won’t be over, the next thing will be killing them

        The constant refrain of “Russia wants to kill every Ukrainian”. It’s never made sense. There has never been any reason to believe that the goal is to kill Ukrainians.

        Can you lay out exactly why you think that Russia will kill Ukrainians once the war is over? Can you lay out why you think the goal is to kill Ukrainians?

          • 133arc585
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The stated goal is killing the Ukrainian identity, a.k.a. genocide.

            Is it? Can you point me to anywhere that that’s the stated goal?

            Never has the stated goal included wanting to genocide Ukrainians. To say that’s the case is to pretend your imagination is reality.

            • tetraodon@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              ‘“What Russia Should Do with Ukraine” (Russian: Что Россия должна сделать с Украиной, romanized: Chto Rossiya dolzhna sdelat’ s Ukrainoy), is an article written by Timofey Sergeytsev and published by the Russian state-owned news agency RIA Novosti. The article calls for the full destruction of Ukraine as a state, as well as the full destruction of the Ukrainian national identity in accordance with Russia’s aim to accomplish the “denazification” of the latter.’

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_Russia_Should_Do_with_Ukraine

              Pretty genocidal if you ask me. And before you say articles on state-owned media don’t count, let’s take a minute to remember what Russia did to Chechenya:

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chechen_genocide

        • takeda@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago
          1. Putin was never hiding that in his opinion Ukraine has no particular cultural significance or uniqueness
          2. If you watch interviews of Muscovies they want to exterminate Ukrainians some people didn’t even have problem with saying that Ukrainian children should be murdered
          3. there are already brutal attacks on Ukrainian civilians and many documented war crimes
          4. nearly a million of Ukrainian kids were kidnapped and sent to Muscovies, that’s basically a textbook example of genocide

          Do you believe things will get better if they have full control over Ukraine?