• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    171
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    Democracy supporters have to win every single time, while the fascists only have to win once. This is not a sustainable situation. We have to do what is necessary in a way that’s a lot more permanent than just winning an election.

    • anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think a big part of this is rural over representation. Not even talking the senate, but the house to be fair should allot 1 rep per the minimum pop of any state, which would give us about 573 reps and like 676 electors for president. Hell if we did it as the founders intended, one per like 60k people we’d have a house of 5.6k members.

    • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      That requires carrying this energy past the election cycle, regardless of the differences we may have on opinion, and coming together in agreement.

      Historically, the Left has been rather poor at banding together. We’re more likely to argue than get things done most of the time. So it’ll be an uphill battle for leaders of smaller groups across the Nation. First though, we need to make it past this hurdle.

        • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s still a choice that we should strive to utilize. Not doing so may mean not having that choice, or the illusion of one. I do agree though, it’s about time we shifted things back towards a better life for everyone.

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Fascism was defeated because of the Allies, led by the US, the country with the most powerful military in the world by a large margin. Who’s going to defeat the US if it goes full fascist?

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          It’s a good question that I don’t have the answer to, but I don’t think the USA would be able to continue funding a military 20x the expense of the next most powerful military while under authoritarian rule. We have the funds for such a military now because of a hundred different conditions that wouldn’t exist anymore under a fascist government.

          • samus12345@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            2 months ago

            Fascist governments always collapse eventually because of loyalty over competence, but the thought of the damage a powerful country like the US would do before that collapse is terrifying.

          • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            The US spends 3.4% of GDP in defence. Israel is at 5.3%. Also the US only spends a bit more then 3x what China spends and well US products are more expensive. So the US can probably fund its military for quite some time, without too many problems and right wingers love to do it, to bomb the shit out of people.

        • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          80% of Nazi casualties happened on the eastern front by the Communists. But yeah, the Soviet Union no longer exists, Russia has fallen to fascism, and now the US has too. The world is fucked.

    • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s only going to happen if the side in favor of democracy is given a decisive victory. Squeaking out another win isn’t going to be enough.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Did Harris have any pro-democracy stuff in her platform, like ending FPTP or the Electoral College? Trump campaigned on bad election reforms like ID requirements and same-day voting.

    • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      There was never any democracy here to save, and no way to make it sustainable without tearing down the constitution and starting over, and no way to hold a new constitutional convention that wouldn’t be poisoned by money and power from the start.

      • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        You’re not completely wrong. There are many aspects of our system that are deeplh undemocratic: the way that the donor class gatekeeps who is able to run, the way politicians serve lobbyists and donors over the public will, and the way that oligarchs own 95% of our news media all create an environment where the interests of the people are not represented by our government

    • umbrella
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      thats exactly why voting is not a solution.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      2 months ago

      So what, at you going to start the french US revolution? That seems like a extreme idea that probably won’t end well.

      The US is a democracy. There is no threat outside of the fake information spread by US adversaries. Even if the worse president is elected there still little danger because of the balance of power.

      Don’t believe me? Look at the past. The supreme court and congress has put the executive branch in its place before. There is not more danger now than there was centuries ago. The US system is far from perfect but it is well proven.

      • draneceusrex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I hope you are right, but excuse me for having doubts. Both Congress and SCOTUS is much more partisan than it was in the past. SCOTUS’s ruling on presidential immunity is a direct example, eroding the checks and balances within the Constitution. McConnell’s behavior and vote during the Jan 6th Impeachment trial is a second example. Trump’s first term in 2016 started with him having no idea what he was doing, so he depended on establishment Republicans who would act as the adults in the room. That term ended with him having fired all of them, and with an attempted coup to stay in power. So far there have been no repercussions to him doing so. So yeah, excuse me for being worried about a potential “dictator on day one” who wants to deport millions of “illegals”, would send the military against his political opponents who he has labeled the “enemy within”, and to completely purge career public servants for loyalists (are you looking forward to Hershal Walker managing our National Missile Defense?).

      • yesman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 months ago

        There is not more danger now than there was centuries ago

        The way you describe American history as “centuries” like we’re the Roman Empire or Egypt when we’ve only got 2.5 centuries to choose from.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Being a continuation of England more or less, you’ve got more. Especially since those democratic traditions were pretty English in the beginning.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Fair but my point still stands. We’ve been here a long time and though much worse times. (The US civil war comes to mind)

          • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 months ago

            (The US civil war comes to mind)

            I mean hey you’re right, we’re still here…but we’d really REALLY like to prevent a second one of those…From the reviews I’ve read it wasn’t a fun time for pretty much anybody involved.

            • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              2 months ago

              There is no chance of a second civil war. The current “crisis” is artificial and brought on by the media.

      • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        The supreme court and congress has put the executive branch in its place before.

        The SC betrayed democracy with Citizens United and again when they gave Trump immunity for his countless crimes while in office. Don’t forget that the SC openly take bribes from billionaires.

    • Zement@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah seems like that was it for the US. Have fun living in Gilead.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            2 months ago

            Please pick another place then here to go. We have enough Americans and your problems.

            • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              2 months ago

              The Americans that want nothing to do with Trump are the ones you want trying to immigrate to your country. Use your brain before you speak. You sound exactly like a republican talking about Mexicans.

              • Deceptichum@quokk.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                The ones who wanted something to do with Kamala aren’t wanted either. The parties are so far right, that most Dem voters would probably support our right wing in my country.

                Id say its more akin to not wanting to take in those Russians who were fleeing conscription at the start of the war.

              • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                No I was talking about how we have a housing crisis and people are freezing to death on the streets, and lets be fair even the “ones who want nothing to do with trump” are still way right of center in a global sense.

                Please go someplace warm instead.

                • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I assume you’re Canadian. This is a problem across North America. Almost nowhere is safe now.

                  The construction industry scaled way back in 2008, and it never really scaled back up in North America. We’re not building enough to keep pace with population growth and to replace aging homes.

                  We need to build, not blame each other.

                • blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  There are more than enough houses for the global homeless population overall. It’s the borders and high rents that are keeping them on the streets, not prospective immigrants.

        • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m lucky enough to have dual EU nation citizenship from my childhood. Going to be digging through my childhood paperwork in case I need it.

      • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Hubris. Democrats lose because characters like RBG and President Biden simply could not fathom that stepping aside was ALWAYS what they should have done.

        These miserable fucking dinosaurs have gambled away the good intentions, hopes, and stability of the entire nation because their internal mantra was that they are our political saviors, while everyone under 50 was full-throated screaming that they needed to step aside.

        Fuck all you geriatric, foot on the gas, oblivious, incompetent fucks. If (big if) we ever regain our Democracy, the first thing on the agenda should be AGE CAPS for all public offices. Elderly fucking hubris has doomed us to more misery.

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 months ago

          Democrats lose because characters like RBG and President Biden simply could not fathom that stepping aside was ALWAYS what they should have done.

          Lol, dude the guy that won the election is the oldest person to ever run for president in the history of the country, and a sitting Democratic president stepped aside due to public pressure for younger leadership, but yeah the concept of gerontocracy is what did them in. 🙄

        • alcoholicorn
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Kyrsten Sinema is in her 40s, Bernie Sanders is in his 80s.

          Age is not the factor here.

          • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Literally the oldest president-elect in American history, but keep acting like age matters.

            It’s attitude. It’s playing by the rules or bending them. Republicans figured out the cheat codes…they can bend the rules and win, or at the very least not lose. Because you can’t, honestly, compete with that. It’s impossible. Lies are far easier to create than they are to refute.

            So either Dems have to go low, and lower the bar further, bend the rules more, and be just as guilty of breaking democracy as the GOP…or they can play clean and lose. There is no winning for the Democrats, and there is no losing for the Republicans. They found the cheat codes.

            What’s more, they got seized control of the anti-cheat (SCOTUS) 4 years ago. Stubbornness is a part of it, sure…RBG was too stubborn to leave at an opportune time…but let’s not kid ourselves over GOP hypocrisy when it came time to fill her seat, and let’s not consider whether or not Trump is stubborn.

            Republicans can do no wrong, but Democrats have to be perfect.

            • alcoholicorn
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              So either Dems have to go low, and lower the bar further, bend the rules more, and be just as guilty of breaking democracy

              If you were elected to do X, and the rules get in the way, it’s antidemocratic to let them stop you.

              Every time the democrats used the parliamentarian or the villain of the week or the republicans or norms or rules they themselves set in the senate as an excuse to do what their voters want (and their donors don’t want), they are breaking democracy.

              Democrats don’t have to be perfect, they have to be effective. Republicans are effective, but only to do bad things. Democrats do manage to be effective sometimes, but only to do bad things, such as when Biden went around congress to keep arms shipments flowing to Israel.

              • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                You are embracing fascism as long as it’s your guys.

                That’s the problem.

                There’s no winning. Democrats embrace fascism, everyone loses. Democrats play by the rules, Democrats lose.

                It’s not for lack of trying. Congress has been too split for too long, Republicans care more about open-carrying to committee meetings than to get anything actually done. They get to make the Democrats look bad by dragging their heels and voting no on anything they bring up. And that makes them heroes, somehow.

                • alcoholicorn
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  No, fascism isn’t when you break rules to be effective in government.

                  Would you call FDR a fascist?

                  Republicans care more about open-carrying to committee meetings than to get anything actually done

                  So go around them. Did you learn nothing from Obama giving the republicans half of the discretionary budget to appeal to their better nature, which the republicans voted against anyway? Or the compromised republican healthcare plan, Obamacare? West wing-brained libs claimed this was a stroke of genius, because everyone would see how civil and reasonable the dems were by reaching across the aisle.

                  And then the dems got blown the fuck out in 2010 because republicans saw their representatives fighting for them, and dem voters saw their representatives unilaterally passing republican policy despite having a super majority in the house and senate.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Age caps are good.

          A rating voting system would be good too.

          But I don’t think there won’t be younger people with the same kind of hubris.

  • itsgroundhogdayagain
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I do not trust Americans to “do their own research”. I’ve seen how that has gone in the past. Too many Americans do their own research while scrolling Facebook from the toilet.

    • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      Research requires a critical mind. Think of a person you know that has average intelligence, 50% of people are more stupid than that.

      And I’m not saying that stupidity is solely an issue for the republican electorate, I’m just saying “do your own research” is an unrealistic expectation.

      People need to be engaged with.

      • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        More to the point, people need to not be told they’re stupid for not already understanding everything there is to know about the theory you’re peddling by a person who has taken some pains to avoid explaining any aspect of that theory.

  • Jo Miran
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Four years ago we gave it a stay of execution. Until we fully purge the fascist and focus government to actually serve the people, we are going to keep finding ourselves in chaos, until China beats us to and at everything.

    • pjwestin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, a Trump victory scares me, but what scares me more is the more competent fascist that comes next. The Democrats can’t keep waiting for the Republicans to, “come to their senses.” The material conditions of the working class need to improve, or fascist populism will take in the absence of economic populism.

      • baggachipz@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        No other fascist has the cult of personality that trump does. If we can rid ourselves of this scourge, it will cause a reckoning and reset among the conservatives. I hope.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s crazy how the global powers have handed China so much power as a result of their insatiable greed. China was hardly a concern 40 years ago, but 4 decades of manufacturing and stealing literally everyone’s IP have given them resources they didn’t have access to before.

  • demizerone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Democratic party is fucking useless. We will never be free unless we rid ourselves of legalized corruption.

    • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Poor take. Truthfully, the people want hate. That’s what trump ran on and promised.

      This isn’t about policy or likeability or whatever. This is what people want and they proved it. Stop blaming the Democrat party and blame what this country and its people are instead.

      • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Are you kidding? The DNC circumvented the entire primary process to give us ANOTHER “anointed one” and, again, possibly the worst candidate possible to create the coalition that has always been Democrats’ bread-and-butter. They even had Hillary go down to FL to lecture voters, while Bill went to Michigan to preach to Muslim communities about why the war in Israel is right. It’s a fucking lampoon of strategy.

        Every single DNC “elite” should retire from politics, today. They’re losers, and losers lose. Because they never learn from their mistakes, which is what is required to win.

        • scemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m sorry, since when is circumventing primary process worse than literally trying to steal an election? You want the perfect Democrat to run, while the other side is running a joke.

          Let’s not kid ourselves, the reason Democrats lost was because of economy and voter apathy. Otherwise, we wouldn’t see Democrats lose control of all branches of the government. No matter what strategies they adopted, it wouldn’t have worked.

          She was already a VP and our country still has inflation. People are idiots and blame it on Democrats.

          • HiddenLychee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            I mean, it’s likely both. Apathy towards hate is still pretty bad imo, and hate is the Republican party platform. Also just saying, the economy needs some inflation and I think we’re around 3% right now, which economists agree is ideal? Not an expert there tho

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          They are elite. Not in quotes. The fact that they remain an elite and will remain an elite under Trump shows us that they are not losers and they don’t lose.

          They didn’t lose control over DNC, that’s what they care about, perpetual real power over half the politics in one big country, not temporary and limited power over all of it.

          In this case they have also shown Trump and anybody else that they are a very convenient opposition, that should remain as it is. It’s a win.

          But you’re the guys who flew to the Moon, invented nukes and the Internet. You’ll think of something.

      • tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        Hate and simple answers. Trump will “fix inflation” and “bring jobs back”, what could be better? Don’t ask how or what it will cost.

      • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        He didn’t say he preferred trump, he said the Democrats are useless.

        Which they are; they couldn’t defeat an orange windbag with transparent aspirations of autocracy.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            2 months ago

            No is really isn’t

            Creating uncertainty is what the Russian influencing campaigns aim to do. The US is as strong as ever and there is no reason to worry at all. We have the balance of powers for a reason.

            • kitnaht@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Look up Viktor Orban and how he successfully dismantled Democracy in Hungary. The plan has already been laid out, and it’s being followed precisely.

              Seriously – the parallels in that journey are shockingly similar.

              The US is as weak as ever as we have a stacked system due to Republicans following the same playbook, and slowly tipping the scales over the time using gerrymandering and whatever they can manage to pull off, any time they can manage to pull it off. We’re seeing less and less people responsible for more and more power. Our supreme court has ruled that the president is immune from prosecution, etc.

              There are plenty of additional examples, but the only way you’re arguing what you’re arguing is if you haven’t been paying attention. If you want more, feel free to look up Project 2025

              • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                2 months ago

                I have looked it up and I think it was BS.

                Also they said the same thing about Biden and we are still here.

                • kitnaht@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Well that’s plenty of proof that you didn’t read anything about Viktor Orban at all. There was nothing about my previous reply that had anything to do with biden - not a single parallel at all. In fact, nobody of note has ever made any similar claim about Biden whatsoever. Thanks for taking the mask off. Have a great day.

              • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Russia is still a threat especially in the cyberspace. We are now in the age of cyber warfare where nations attack and try to influence each other.

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I wonder how quickly will the US progress from Elon Musk prancing around on stage to Trump Jack Ma-ing him, or if Bloomberg will commit suicide by six shots to the back of the head.

      The golden age of the US oligarchy has been this past period. Under fascism, the causal relationship between having power and money reverses.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        WDYM, Hitler was pretty friendly with German oligarchy. No suiciding them or something, their relationships were pretty chill, having fun together, going to countryside, going to each other with families, having coffee.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        what are you even talking about? Rich people are last on a long list of scapegoats

        • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Look at Russia’s oligarchs. Hell, look at Hungary.

          There was this one wealthy guy bankrolling Orbán’s campaigns, one of the wealthiest people in Hungary. He got into an argument with Orbán publicly. Today he’s neither wealthy, nor living in Hungary.

          The people will not turn on rich people. I’m saying rich people are used to be controlling politics, but in a Russian style system, rich people are controlled BY politics, not the other way around.

          • Fedizen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            He’s still alive and no longer in hungary? so like rich people might move to their vacation estate for a year or two? this is just ordinary rich people stuff except instead of doing it for a tax cut they’re doing it because they publicly disagreed. Its theater. The whole point is to protect the money piles. It took russia like 20 years to start fussing about rich people that left the country

            • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 months ago

              Imagine Murdoch arguing with Trump, trying to bankroll another party to rein him in, with it ending in him selling all his news outlets and retiring.

              The point is that money doesn’t get you political power in this system.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        It depends if Vance can place a rollerskate at the top of the White House steps before that happens.

      • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s more like all pretense is gone now. Before, there was this veneer of legitimacy. Now, it’s straight up fascism. It’s a matter of image projection.

      • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        More like the oligarchy now have 99% of the power rather than 98%.

        The issue is that we believe we have a free democracy when the only power we have is to put an X in a box every few years. The system isn’t broken, it’s working as it’s designed to.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          The issue is that we believe we have a free democracy when the only power we have is to put an X in a box every few years.

          Right.

      • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        True.

        But now more of the hurdles will be removed. Gotta make that wealth extraction more efficient 📈🥴
        Can’t let those poor and middle class people hold onto any of their money.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s not true, we had a good run from the forties until I was born in the eighties. A whole forty years of some amount of power!

        • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          do you understand how much of the civil rights movement has happened since the eighties?

          we’ve made them make concessions before. we’ve won before. we could win again.

          and you… you have no idea how badly i wish i believed what i just said.

          • aesthelete@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Yeah I guess before the full weight of the citizens united decision killed what was left we eaked out a bit of stuff.

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Voting is like breathing.

    Every election is the most important one of yopur life.

  • itsgroundhogdayagain
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    We need a “bad guy” for everyone to get back on the same team but as it turns out, we are the “bad guy”.

    • eldavi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      that’s why we keep being forced to chose between the lesser of two evils; it’s still evil either way

      • kitnaht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Except people aren’t choosing the lesser of 2 evils every time. If they did, it would pass back across that “Evil” line. That’s literally the nature of it.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not when both choices keep gradually drifting towards more evil. The current Dem leadership is to the right of Reagan and trying to rehabilitate one of the worst war criminals and -profiteers in the history of the world and his ideologically identical daughter.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      I see what you are saying but I don’t think that’s the problem. The problem is the media turning everything into a dramatic fight for freedom. It happens on both sides and it is always us vs them.

      Americans need to stop believing what they are told and do there own research. Additionally, we need more factual sources of information. (Spoiler: the national news isn’t one of them)

      • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 months ago

        do there own research

        Aye, they could maybe start with researching there spelling lol

  • UltraGiGaGigantic
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    I get why people say you “have to” vote against someone in a First Past The Post voting system. What I don’t get is the inaction from the democratic party on changing the voting system between elections.

    I wish the democrats had one tenth the urgency they claim to have. Democracy is one election away from falling… wouldn’t you want multiple chances to defeat the republicans every election?

    Democrats are so full of themselves, they won’t accept that they might have to step out of the way to prevent the republicans from ruining this country. This fight is greater then the democratic party. They should start acting like it by pushing to get rid of FPTP voting in the states they control.

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 months ago

      What I don’t get is the inaction from the democratic party on changing the voting system between elections.

      1. The Democrats didn’t secure a large enough majority in previous elections to overcome Republican resistance to changing things like FPTP voting or the electoral college.

      2. There is a lot of contention within the Democratic party (at the federal level at least) as it shifts further towards the right in an effort to remain in power. Getting rid of FPTP voting would make it harder for centrist/right leaning Democrats to remain in power.

      Several states have switched to RCV for some of their elections, and progress has been slow, but it’s being made. If you want to see more, elect people that prioritize implementing better voting systems.

    • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Democrats are so full of themselves, they won’t accept that they might have to step out of the way to prevent the republicans from ruining this country

      you mean like biden did?