• Cryan24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    8 hours ago

    So company with vested interest thinks people should do thing that makes the company money, gotcha

  • paraphrand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    So we downvote here when we disagree with an article? Wouldn’t you wanna upvote it so others see the bullshit Adobe is spouting?

    • ElPussyKangaroo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I had the same confusion a while back… This is just an article… There’s no point in downvoting the post sharing the article…

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    They prolly right. Peeps of da future prolly look back and be like, “damn! Art before 2022 really kinda sucked!”

  • over_clox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Sure, because screw artists with unique talent and style, let’s just have AI crank out the same style crap every day…

    I’m rapidly getting tired of this new AI art era, looks like the same shit every day anymore.

    Where’s the human factor anymore? Where’s the talent, where’s the skill?

    • And009@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      That’s not how we should see it. Digital artists spend a lot of time creating and trying different things. On the other hand we have people with different conditions who have ideas without the skills yo execute anything.

      This allows everyone to do more and quicker, increasing the earning potential. AI is useful as long as it levels out the playing field. It’s the malicious use we need to moderate and like drugs, thats a slippery slope.

      • socphoenix@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        How does it increase earning potential? Best case it would flood the market with shit and result in less income due to either dilution of spending amongst thousands of idiots using “ai” or destroy the need for a market in the first place. If everything is ai why would I pay the “artist” instead of just going to stablediffusion or something similar?

  • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 hours ago

    One can look at art as either being about “the end result” or about the process of human expression. AI can produce the former (of varying quality), but not the latter.

  • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I too embrace Adobe Illustrator once but i’m not successful. Cool program though.

    Wait, wrong AI.

    • And009@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s by far my favorite tool. Want to see what AI can actually do and not the crap they are pushing so far

  • Deceptichum@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    35
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Let the Luddite’s not use it if they don’t want to, they’re only hurting themselves.

    • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      There’s no such thing as AI assist for decades and people still success creating masterpiece. It’s techbro and tech tycoon that hurts everyone.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      plagiarism != art

      No matter how many artists’ work is collected, combined, and regurgitated as algorithm puke, it’s still not art and never will be.

      • Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 minutes ago

        Anyone spreading this misinformation and trying gatekeep being an artist after the avant-garde movement doesn’t have an ounce of education in art history. Generative art, warts and all, is a vital new form of art that’s shaking things up, challenging preconceptions, and getting people angry - just like art should.