• Capt. Wolf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 month ago

      I tried decades ago. Grew up learning BASIC and then C, how hard could it be? For a 12 year old with no formal teacher and only books to go off of, it turns out, very. I’ve learned a lot of coding languages on my own since, but I still can’t make heads or tales of assembly.

      • Dubiousx99@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 month ago

        Assembly requires a knowledge of the cpu architecture pipeline and memory storage addressing. Those concepts are generally abstracted away in modern languages

        • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          You don’t need to know the details of the CPU architecture and pipeline, just the instruction set.

          Memory addressing is barely abstracted in C, and indexing in some form of list is common in most programming languages, so I don’t think that’s too hard to learn.

          You might need to learn the details of the OS. That would get more complicated.

          • Dubiousx99@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 month ago

            I said modern programming languages. I do not consider C a modern language. The point still stands about abstraction in modern languages. You don’t need to understand memory allocation to code in modern languages, but the understanding will greatly benefit you.

            I still contend that knowledge of the cpu pipeline is important or else your code will wind up with a bunch of code that is constantly resulting in CPU interrupts. I guess you could say you can code in assembly without knowledge of the cpu architecture, but you won’t be making any code that runs better the output code from other languages.

      • zod000
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Sounds very similar to my own experience though there was a large amount of Pascal in between BASIC and C.

        • Capt. Wolf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah, I skipped Pascal, but it at least makes sense when you look at it. By the time my family finally jumped over to PC, C was more viable. Then in college, when I finally had to opportunity to formally learn, it was just C++ and HTML… We didn’t even get Java!

          • zod000
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            I had used like four different flavors of BASIC by the time I got a IBM compatible PC, but I ended up getting on the Borland train and ended up with Turbo Pascal, Turbo C, and Turbo ASM (and Turbo C++ that I totally bounced off of). I was in the first class at my school that learned Java in college. It was the brand new version 1.0.6! It was so rough and new, but honestly I liked it. It’s wildly different now.