• gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You and many other humans are doing verification work

      It’s pretty sure it’s already right, but if enough people get the same image and get it wrong the same way then something’s up, flag it

        • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I took some compsci classes years ago when this tech was new and that’s exactly how it was described as being handled

          Once image recognition software got good enough to be right most of the time they started this shit to help get it the rest of the way to all of the time

          Do it any other way and you have to pay those people

    • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Theres a CGPGrey video that describes old techniques. It’s not quite up to date on some of its predictions, but it is how some machine learning works. Of course, it doesn’t discuss current proprietary techniques, because those are company secrets. Still, it’s as good a guess we’ll likely get, unless something radically different has been invented:

      https://youtu.be/R9OHn5ZF4Uo

      There is also a second video about more modern stuff, but it’s more a footnote:
      https://youtu.be/wvWpdrfoEv0