• Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I hate these hyperbolic headlines describing some tiny poll movement in a single poll well within the margin of error, describing it a some definitive clear change in support.

    Here’s the times sienna poll today for instance, another high quality pollster, where she went from tied to now 3% ahead and is leading for the first time in that poll since July.

    https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4921203-kamala-harris-donald-trump-national-new-york-times-poll/

    If the race is truly a 3 point gap right now, and the margin of error is plus or minus 4 percent, you’re going to see polls with her everywhere from one behind to 7 ahead. It’s a bad idea to hyper scrutinize or draw big conclusions from tiny changes in one poll.

  • kamenLady.@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I really would like to see those 43%.

    Like, after years and years of Trump upping the ante in presenting himself as the biggest turd alive, there are still people that sincerely think “yeah, I’d like him as president - he represents the values i stand in for”…?

    I would just like to see the people, because a minority of them will be your typical MAGA-Puppet.

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Most of them are completely isolated from all news or political information, except for the local radio they hear on their way to work, and Fox News.
      It’s hard to believe, but millions of people simply haven’t heard about how shitty Trump is.

      • fluxion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        They do have one liberal on Fox News that has laid out most of Trump’s bigger oopsies at one point or another but they apparently ignore every single word she says.

    • GiddyGap@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      I have many extended family members among the 43. They dismiss any criticism against Trump as “fake news” and “liberal media agenda.” Nothing will ever make them not vote Trump. It’s wild.

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m in a large city in Iowa on the edge of town. If I drive 5 minutes down the road I will see for sure one small Trump sign, one small Harris sign, a farm house with a few Trump signs of various sizes, then another with a few large ones held up with fence posts. That’s places that I know of off the top of my head, but if I drive further I will not see another Harris sign unless I get down town residential. They are disgustingly all over.

    • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      A lot of these morons see politics as a team sport. You might as well ask a Packers fan to support the Vikings or a United fan to get behind City.

  • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Respondents rated the economy as the top issue facing the country, and some 44% said Trump had the better approach on addressing the “cost of living,” compared to 38% who picked Harris. Among a range of economic issues the next president should address, some 70% of respondents said the cost of living would be the most important, with only tiny shares picking the job market, taxes or “leaving me better off financially.” Trump had more support than Harris in each of those areas as well, although voters by a margin of 42% to 35% thought Harris was the better candidate to address the gap between wealthy and average Americans.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      It would be nice to press these people on why they think that, though it’s probably just “that’s what I heard.”

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s not that complicated. Inflation is 20% since Trump left office, it was only 8% for Trump. Unemployment was good during both terms, other than COVID lockdown periods. Trump had good wage growth numbers, Biden only has ok numbers for yoy, not across his whole term.

  • Asidonhopo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Polymarket has Trump ahead by 6 points. Don’t shoot the messenger, I’m signing up for a passport today just in case.

    • auzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      We’d be happy to have you in Australia mate.

      God we need more normal people here. Happy to ship out cookers and loonies up to the US as a trade

      • Asidonhopo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I appreciate the warm welcome! We’ll see if I can find a place with low enough rent, I assume Australia has something like the same housing crisis the US and Canada has?

        We have plenty of cookers and loonies here too, yours would find their people here. Would make a great swap imho

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    If you’re wondering why her, her campaign, and DNC leadership keep pretending it’s a coincidence the more conservative she becomes the worse she polls…

    It’s because they’re all making a lot of money from donors in return for all her conservative shifts.

    Presidential campaigns “cost” over a billion dollars now. That’s a lot of fat to trim off for a lot of people.

    And with the DNC valuing donation bundlers over any other skill, it’s seems like it should be pretty obvious they care more about grifting money than getting Harris elected.

    Anyone that says it takes over a billion dollars to beat trump shouldn’t be running a campaign for local dog catcher. But they’ll never stop trying to get more money. Instead of just trying to get more votes.

    The people running the party have different goals than the voters in the party

    • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Straight from the article:

      Respondents rated the economy as the top issue facing the country, and some 44% said Trump had the better approach on addressing the “cost of living,” compared to 38% who picked Harris. Among a range of economic issues the next president should address, some 70% of respondents said the cost of living would be the most important, with only tiny shares picking the job market, taxes or “leaving me better off financially.” Trump had more support than Harris in each of those areas as well, although voters by a margin of 42% to 35% thought Harris was the better candidate to address the gap between wealthy and average Americans. Trump appeared buoyed by widespread concerns over immigration, currently at its highest level in America in over a century. Some 53% of voters in the poll said they agreed with a statement that “immigrants who are in the country illegally are a danger to public safety,” compared to 41% who disagreed. Voters had been more closely divided on the question in a May Reuters/Ipsos poll, when 45% agreed and 46% disagreed.

      I have a dream that one day we will be permitted to read and digest one of these articles without you feeling the compulsive need to preempt that to tell us what you think we’re supposed to believe, and to steer us into one of your fever dreams about some other tangentially-related topic. Wouldn’t that be lovely.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Some 53% of voters in the poll said they agreed with a statement that “immigrants who are in the country illegally are a danger to public safety,” compared to 41% who disagreed. Voters had been more closely divided on the question in a May Reuters/Ipsos poll, when 45% agreed and 46% disagreed.

        Ahhh good to know some things never change. Good old hateful racist assholes Americans being asshole Americans. I hate living here with these fucking ghouls. The only dangerous people are actual American citizens…

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        90% sure we’ve went over this before…

        X% of voters includes Republicans that will never vote D under any circumstances

        To motivate people who will vote D. We need to focus on what they want.

        Did it work this time?

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            Do you want to just insult people?

            Or are you willing to abide by this subs rules and have a reasonable discussion?

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                You can still vote for someone even if you think we deserve a better candidate, I’ve been doing it for decades at this point…

                There’s no reason to insult people or act like you can’t criticize the least worst option while still holding your nose and voting for them.

                The majority of Dem voters shouldn’t be shocked by that. We’ve been doing it for a long time…

                I can count the people I know who wanted Biden or Hillary as president on one hand but virtually everyone i know still voted for both of them in the last two elections.

                It would just be a lot easier to stop trump if we ran a candidate that Dem voters wanted to be president.

                That shouldn’t be a relevation either

                • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I think there’s a time and a place for criticizing our candidates. The time is during the candidate’s term and in the Primaries. During the General, it’s a bad time to do so. And you have to realise: You don’t always get what you want. You say you want a candidate that Dem voters want to be President. The opportunity for that to happen is in the primaries. Unfortunately, the time for that has come and gone.

                  Biden won those primaries. The voters for the Democratic Party, who ALL get a say, put Biden up front. And people hammered Biden, including bad actors from the other party as well as from foreign countries, until Biden had no room for error. When he flubbed the first debate, we used the rules for succession, with him stepping down and his VP taking the top spot, like what would happen if he was rendered incapable of serving while he was in office.

                  I return to my key point. Trump or Harris are our choices today. No Third Party will win. As long as you are voting for Harris, criticise away. Just know that I will push back against any post that seems to suggest our candidate is horribad and shouldn’t be voted for. Not voting for Harris means we get Trump.