• stardust@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 minutes ago

    Google also can’t:

    • Offer developers money or perks not to launch their apps on rival stores

    This is pretty hilarious if you know about Epic’s strategy on PC.

  • Quack Doc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Google will have to distribute rival third-party app stores within Google Play, and it must give rival third-party app stores access to the full catalog of Google Play apps, unless developers opt out individually.

    what the fuck. I don’t like google, I run fully Foss, and only recently installed microG, but I don’t agree with this garbage.

    It’s easy enough to install any third party appstore. I don’t agree with this at all.

    • MrSoup@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      59 minutes ago

      What’s the problem? This will make Aurora Store more stable

    • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      52 minutes ago

      It’s easy enough to install any third party appstore.

      There is one of the differences between the average Lemmy user vs the average android user.

      I could guarantee most people in the two English courses I’m in or the humanities course I’m in would struggle with how to install a 3rd party app store since they either use apple or aren’t super tech savvy.

  • Bob Robertson IX@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’ve installed Amazon’s app store, and FDroid and never had an issue. Are these not considered third-party stores?

  • catsup@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    rofl at this title trying to victimize google for being monopolistic assholes

    • Sestren@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 hours ago

      How does the title victimize Google?.. It literally just summarizes the article, and then in the first sentence of the actual article they flat out call Google an illegal monopoly.

      • catsup@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        “Must crack open”

        crack open has negative connotations. “Must allow” is a much more neutral way to phrase it.

        “Epic Judge”

        The judge isn’t epic’s, it’s just the judge that happens to be dealing with this case.

        • vrek@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Ok, they got me on the second one… I was seriously wondering how epic had their own judge and it wasn’t conflict of interest.