RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works to Android@lemmy.worldEnglish · 14 hours agoGoogle must crack open Android for third-party stores, rules Epic judgewww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up147arrow-down11cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@hexbear.netandroid@lemdro.idantitrust
arrow-up146arrow-down1external-linkGoogle must crack open Android for third-party stores, rules Epic judgewww.theverge.comRmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works to Android@lemmy.worldEnglish · 14 hours agomessage-square12fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@hexbear.netandroid@lemdro.idantitrust
minus-squareSestren@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·13 hours agoHow does the title victimize Google?.. It literally just summarizes the article, and then in the first sentence of the actual article they flat out call Google an illegal monopoly.
minus-squarecatsup@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down2·edit-212 hours ago“Must crack open” crack open has negative connotations. “Must allow” is a much more neutral way to phrase it. “Epic Judge” The judge isn’t epic’s, it’s just the judge that happens to be dealing with this case.
minus-squarevrek@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·9 hours agoOk, they got me on the second one… I was seriously wondering how epic had their own judge and it wasn’t conflict of interest.
How does the title victimize Google?.. It literally just summarizes the article, and then in the first sentence of the actual article they flat out call Google an illegal monopoly.
“Must crack open”
crack open has negative connotations. “Must allow” is a much more neutral way to phrase it.
“Epic Judge”
The judge isn’t epic’s, it’s just the judge that happens to be dealing with this case.
Judge:
Dudes: Whoa… epic!
Ok, they got me on the second one… I was seriously wondering how epic had their own judge and it wasn’t conflict of interest.