• Auli@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    What I don’t get who gets the money if every app in the App Store must be on the third party store.

  • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 hours ago

    and it must give rival third-party app stores access to the full catalog of Google Play apps, unless developers opt out individually.

    Is it just me or does this part sound a little weird?
    So every alternative app store will be a perfect clone of Play’s app offering? Potentially without the app devs even knowing since it’s a opt-out? huh?

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Sounds that way to me.

      Which means developers being expected by users to support installation and updating through systems they don’t use. Because we know that users have common sense and would never expect the unreasonable, especially from small devs.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      This is very dumb. So if a purchase a google play store app in epic store who gets the cut, what is the cut. Does google take their percentage and then epic takes theirs.

  • jonesy@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Google also can’t:

    Share app revenue “with any person or entity that distributes Android apps” or plans to launch an app store or app platform

    Offer developers money or perks to launch their apps on the Play Store exclusively or first

    Offer developers money or perks not to launch their apps on rival stores

    Ok, now do Epic and their paid exclusive practices.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      They won’t, because the reason these are being implemented is because Google is considered a monopoly.

      It’s not about making a fair playing field. Anti-monopoly stuff is about giving other companies advantages to help them compete.

  • smeg@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Offer device makers or carriers money or perks to preinstall the Play Store

    Does this cover GApps in general, I wonder?

    it wanted … Google to stop being able to tie Android APIs to Google Play.

    I feel this would have been really big news

    The Apple case is already over, and Apple mostly won

    Seems crazy that Google is forced to open up when Android is already kind of open but Apple get away with keeping iOS very closed

    Offer developers money or perks to launch their apps on the Play Store exclusively or first

    Lol, as if Epic got away with this given that it’s exactly what they do with PC games!