• bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I’ve updated an Arch install after not being used for 2 years. I don’t think there were any issues.

    I’ve experienced far more issues upgrading to a new major release of an apt based distro though…

    • qprimed
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      what did you do to that poor oldstable, you, you… monster???

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      That apt based distro was Ubuntu, wasn’t it?
      I never successfully upgraded that from one release to the next.

      • llii@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I had success in upgrading a core ubuntu server with only apache and PHP installed … But I don’t think there is a less complicated ununtu install possible.

    • fallingcats@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Then you were definitely lucky with the timeframe. Arch specifically sometimes has updates you need a recent version of pacman to even apply, which means you’ll be left behind if you wait for too long. Last time was the switch to .zstd compressed packages: if you didn’t have a pacman that supported them you had to manually go and find a pacman from the correct time frame plus all it’s deps.