• dragontamer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    No. Republicans loved that Vance pushed back here.

    This is not the win yall think it is.


    Walz did fine. Not as good as JD Vance but I at least wasn’t expecting Walz to do as well as JD Vance. Yall got the election if you keep the topic on Trump. Don’t get distracted here, especially when its an L or at best, stalemate on your image.

      • dragontamer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        58 minutes ago

        Convince people. The quick polls are already in.

        Walz is fine though. I don’t remember any mistake honestly. But the numbers are in already. We can say solidly that JD Vance did better.

        • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          56 minutes ago

          22 people is hardly a survey for a national election, and is a total nonanswer. I’m asking you what you think Vance did better.

          • dragontamer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            43 minutes ago

            Image, body language. Looking at the camera with the “Marine Stare” to show off with body language his disdain for a particular topic or response from Walz (while Walz’s body language was not nearly as effective at showing JD Vance’s weird shit).

            If you’re not aware of what “Republicans see as weird”, well… guess what?? JD Vance is, and he’s able to rally people with just a glance. It was clearly effective. Though perhaps in a “deeper” political look / visual communication cue rather than actual talking.

            JD Vance is the complete package. Walz is well spoken but not quite as emoted and not as good of a reaction to JD Vance.


            Don’t get me wrong, JD Vance is fucking nuts. But if you’re not seeing JD Vance’s good performance here, you’re at risk at underestimating the scope of the problem here.


            EDIT: Like… base things. The things people care about. Like, “Who looked more like a soldier” (especially on the meta-topic of JD Vance service record vs Tim Walz’s service record), JD Vance looked more like a soldier. Base things that appeal to the ID and not logic. JD Vance is spot on on these issues.

            I don’t think it matters because Donald Trump is the actual topic of discussion. But JD Vance’s performance is better than you’d think within a Republican mindset.

            Its fine because Walz didn’t need to win this debate. Walz just needed to punt and he’s accomplished that. JD Vance isn’t going to turn all of Trump’s ills away with one good debate performance either (especially since Walz wasn’t crushed or defeated).

            Walz needed to introduce his personality to the country. And Walz did that. Good. Take the W for what it is, but don’t overplay your hand here. This isn’t like the Harris v Trump debate where Harris crushed Trump. This is actually slight win to JD Vance IMO but Walz is good enough to not damage Harris’s campaign kinda debate.

            • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              20 minutes ago

              I know you’re getting downvoted, but I appreciate this analysis. I have autism and don’t pick up on body language

            • Pissman2020@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              43 minutes ago

              Because the point of an election is to determine who has the best body language. You heard it here first folks

              • fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                23 minutes ago

                You jest but half a country are below average intelligence. It’s not outlandish to think that many individuals in that half aren’t really following what is being said or understand it. What they can follow is the visuals. How they look, how they stand, how they move; how they “read”. And a non-trivial number of above average people still judge books by their covers.

                I think the point the person above was trying to make is that Vance won the area the majority of people can evaluate and the importance of visuals.

              • Zexks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 minutes ago

                You all don’t seem to understand how stupid people vote. Or what’s important to them or most importantly HOW FUCKING MANY OF THEM YHERE ARE.

              • dragontamer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                30 minutes ago

                Harris’s body language was far superior to Trump’s. And is part of why she crushed him so completely.

                EDIT: Body language is incredibly important to QAnon btw, because QAnon believes that JD Vance is not free to speak his mind. So these nods and looks JD Vance are doing are non-verbal acknowledgements that also plays to the whole “Q” and “Deep State” shit. Yadda-yadda.

                I’m not sure if you’re recognizing the threat this body language actually is, or the role its playing in this debate. Tim Walz certainly looks completely ignorant to it all (or at least, doesn’t want to deal with it). This is JD Vance literally leaning into Q-shit and rallying it.