• moody@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 months ago

    Wasn’t blocking of third-party cookies already an option for quite some time now? What’s different with this version that it’s mentioned as a new feature?

    • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      CHIPS is a new way that cookies can work. The difference is that 3rd party cookies are opt-in for the browser, not opt-out, which is better

      • moody@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        That makes sense and sounds better.

        They worded it as “support for blocking third-party cookies” which sounds like reframing the system that was already in place as something new, rather than something actually new.

    • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I would love to know too, it seems like every month for at least a year now I read that “the new Firefox release blocks third party cookies”

  • anguo@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    However, please keep in mind that this is a pre-release version not intended for production use as it may lead to data loss.

    … “Production”? “Data loss”? It’s a browser.

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Are you joking? A lot of people do most of their work in browsers these days. Having cookies suddenly misbehave can lead to severe data loss.

      • anguo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I would imagine anything more than session info would be stored to LocalStorage, then promptly sent to the server.