• DrunkenPirate@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes and No. Yes, it’s not only corporations and we must act ourselves.

    No, it’s the rules that set the game. Corporations play within the rules. Politics is owning and can change the rules. The society and corporations will follow accordingly. If we really want to change we can. Look what happened during Covid. In retrospect, some insane rules (eg Germany kids not allowed to enter playgrounds. Kids couldn’t play to save the elderly). However, society obeyed to those rules.

    It’s not us, it’s the rules that must change. In my view this should be the priority.

    • Kanzar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      At least here in Australia parents were using the kids at the playground to socialise (standing right up in each other’s space, holding empty coffee cups to justify no mask), and so there were multiple vectors of infection. That and multigenerational households are more common in some parts of the world, so if the kid brings it home, whole family gets sick, hospital system overloads.

      It wasn’t specifically kids suffer so oldies don’t die, but the continuation is that if the oldies are healthy, if anyone needs the hospital, there’ll be staff to look after them.

      TL;DR people are taking the piss and making the jobs of HCWs harder… Not like that’s anything new 🙄

      • pwalker@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        yeah it was obviously the same on any playground so the above comment saying it was “to safe elderly” is just very short sighted. Additionaly implying that this was the case in whole of Germany is again wrong. Each federal state had it’s own health regulations in place but yeah some of those were kind of mediated by the ministry of health. Anyway it was a lot more complex than what this comment suggests

        • DrunkenPirate@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Sure it was more complex. Not going to write a Phd here.

          My point is, the society accepts rules even tough rules if it’s for everyone. If it’s fair. So, at Covid times younger people, who are less likely to get serious sickness were accepting being „caged“ for two years (exaggerating a bit. If you are 5 years old. 2 years is half of your life!)

          I strongly miss this generational fairness when it comes to climate change. Not seeing any step back in terms of carbon consumption/ consumption at all from the older people.

      • DrunkenPirate@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t know about your country. The bigger goal in Europe was to keep hospitals working. Goal was not to Triage people cos hospitals were crowed. That happened in the beginning in Northern Italy. At Triage you look at who has biggest chances of survival, who is worth to invest your effort. Guess if it’s the elderly or the younger.

        Just to make it clear. It’s fine for me how it worked out in Germany. China is the blue print how it worked bad. But want to make my argument that all that rules were on the shoulders of the younger generation to safe the elderly.

        Right now in Germany, we have an insane political discussion about carbon reduction. It’s about actions. Being active. So, your heaters need to be replaced from oil and gas to renewables. Yes, it will cost some money. Do you think people are following that goal to safe the younger generations? I‘m pretty pissed about my and the older generation. And concerned about the reality for my kids.

    • arcturus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      and guess who lobbies a ridiculous amount to either keep the rules the same or bias it further towards their interests

      yep, corporations once again

      • DrunkenPirate@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Indeed. Go out at the street and show you want change. Politics fear many people on streets fighting for their rights. Look at France, Israel. When was last time you fight for your rights?

    • trainsaresexy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      However, society obeyed to those rules.

      We did but we’re paying for it now with the rise of “-isms” whose values are built on stifling change. 2-3 years of rapid change might have helped redefine an era of politics for the contrary. TBD I guess.