• ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I say this as a creator; it is not stealing to take something that can be replicated infinitely without cost.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      It can be reproduced indefinitely without cost to the creator. It’s the first production that’s a removed.

      How is initial production funded if nobody is willing to pay for it?

      • repungnant_canary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        If it were fairly funded it would be easier to find the money. Because right now tickets and subscriptions are most expensive ever yet just a few months ago US writers had to go on a long strike. If execs and “stars” stopped taking astronomical amounts of money then the production costs would probably go down.

      • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Up front through things like kickstarter? instead of convincing a publisher to sign you on you have to convince a crowd

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Artists will create art regardless of whether they are paid for it.

        In any case, sale of physical media and merchandising will earn plenty to fund production.